Assessing potential benefits of visits to neighborhoods with higher tree canopy coverage using mobility data: Associations with cardiovascular health outcomes in twenty US metropolitan areas.

Autor: Wei H; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA. Electronic address: hanxue.wei@nyulangone.org., Renson A; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA., Huang X; Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA., Thorpe LE; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA., Spoer BR; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA., Charles SL; Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Health & place [Health Place] 2024 Sep; Vol. 89, pp. 103299. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 27.
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103299
Abstrakt: Background: Research on health benefits due to exposure to green space, such as tree canopy coverage, has predominantly focused on canopy coverage in home neighborhoods. Yet exposures to tree canopy coverage in other spaces visited during the week or on weekends outside the home neighborhoods remains largely unexplored.
Objectives: We examined whether differences in coverage levels of tree canopy in neighborhoods visited compared to home neighborhoods was associated with lower prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, adjusting for exposure to home canopy coverage. We further investigated if the associations varied across levels of home canopy coverage, and if they were more pronounced on weekdays or weekends.
Methods: We used 2018 mobile phone data from the twenty largest U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). For each home census tract, we derived a weighted tree canopy coverage exposure from all visited tracts based on the proportion of visits to other tracts by home tract residents. We subtracted home canopy coverage from the weighted canopy coverage in each of the visited tracts to calculate tract-specific differences. We evaluated associations between differences in tree canopy coverage and prevalence of CHD and stroke via spatial error models, adjusting for tract-level home canopy coverage, MSA, socioeconomic and built environment characteristics.
Results: For every ten-percentage-point increase in tree canopy coverage in visited tracts relative to home tracts, there was a 0.32-0.34% decrease in stroke prevalence. Association with CHD prevalence was not observed after adjusting for spatial autocorrelation. Variations between weekdays and weekends were minimal. The difference in tree canopy coverage was associated with CHD prevalence only for home tracts with low tree canopy coverage, while the difference was associated with stroke prevalence across home tracts with low, moderate, and high tree canopy coverage, with diminishing effect size.
Discussion: This study identified that greater tree canopy coverage in visited neighborhoods relative to home neighborhoods was associated with lower stroke prevalence, and associations varied across home neighborhoods with different tree canopy coverage levels. It emphasized the need to factor in the neighborhood mobility networks in urban planning initiatives to promote cardiovascular health.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: