Comprehensive Evaluation of Novel Biomaterials for Dental Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
| Autor: | Lakshmi Mounika K; Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, IND., Lanke RB; Department of Dentistry, Familia Dental Midland, Midland, USA., Mudaliyar MC; Department of Dentistry, Private Practice, Midland, USA., Khandelwal S; Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, IND., Gaddam B; Department of Periodontology, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, IND., Boyapati R; Department of Periodontology, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, IND. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2024 May 27; Vol. 16 (5), pp. e61175. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 27 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.61175 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Dental implantology is continually evolving in its quest to discover new biomaterials to improve dental implant success rates. The study explored the potential of innovative biomaterials for dental implant surfaces, including titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) alloy, hydroxyapatite-coated titanium (HA-Ti), and porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK), in comparison to conventional commercially pure titanium (CP Ti). Materials and Methods: A total of 186 samples were harvested for the analysis. Biomaterials were thoroughly evaluated in terms of surface topography, chemical composition, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, osseointegration performance, and bacterial adhesion. Study methods and techniques included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), cell culture variants, tensile tests, hardness measurements, histological analysis, and microbiological testing. Results: Surface topography examination showed significant disparities between the biomaterials: Ti-Zr had a better roughness of 1.23 μm, while HA-Ti demonstrated a smoother surface at 0.98 μm. Chemical composition evaluation indicated the presence of a Ti-Zr alloy in Ti-Zr, calcium-phosphorus richness in HA-Ti, and high titanium amounts in CP Ti. The mechanical properties assessment showed that Ti-Zr and CP Ti had good tensile strengths of 750 MPa and 320 HV. In addition, bacterial adhesion tests showed low propensities for Ti-Zr and HA-Ti at 1200 and 800 cfu/cm 2 , respectively. Conclusion: Ti-Zr and HA-Ti performed better than the other biomaterials in surface topography and mechanical properties and against bacterial adhesion. This study emphasizes that multi-parameter analysis is critical for clinical decision-making, allowing for the selection of the currently available biomaterial, which could be conducive to the long-term success of the implant. Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethical Committee of Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences issued approval SIDS/IEC/41/2021. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024, Lakshmi Mounika et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|