Facial mimicry interference reduces working memory accuracy for facial emotion expressions.

Autor: Holmer E; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.; Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden., Rönnberg J; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.; Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden., Asutay E; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.; JEDI Lab, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden., Tirado C; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden., Ekberg M; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Jun 26; Vol. 19 (6), pp. e0306113. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 26 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306113
Abstrakt: Facial mimicry, the tendency to imitate facial expressions of other individuals, has been shown to play a critical role in the processing of emotion expressions. At the same time, there is evidence suggesting that its role might change when the cognitive demands of the situation increase. In such situations, understanding another person is dependent on working memory. However, whether facial mimicry influences working memory representations for facial emotion expressions is not fully understood. In the present study, we experimentally interfered with facial mimicry by using established behavioral procedures, and investigated how this interference influenced working memory recall for facial emotion expressions. Healthy, young adults (N = 36) performed an emotion expression n-back paradigm with two levels of working memory load, low (1-back) and high (2-back), and three levels of mimicry interference: high, low, and no interference. Results showed that, after controlling for block order and individual differences in the perceived valence and arousal of the stimuli, the high level of mimicry interference impaired accuracy when working memory load was low (1-back) but, unexpectedly, not when load was high (2-back). Working memory load had a detrimental effect on performance in all three mimicry conditions. We conclude that facial mimicry might support working memory for emotion expressions when task load is low, but that the supporting effect possibly is reduced when the task becomes more cognitively challenging.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Holmer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje