Relationship Between Advanced Footwear Technology Longitudinal Bending Stiffness and Energy Cost of Running.

Autor: Rodrigo-Carranza V; Sports Performance Research Group (GIRD), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.; Integrative Locomotion Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA., Hoogkamer W; Integrative Locomotion Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA., González-Ravé JM; Sports Performance Research Group (GIRD), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain., González-Mohíno F; Sports Performance Research Group (GIRD), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.; Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida y de la Naturaleza, Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports [Scand J Med Sci Sports] 2024 Jun; Vol. 34 (6), pp. e14687.
DOI: 10.1111/sms.14687
Abstrakt: Introduction/purpose: Shoe longitudinal bending stiffness (LBS) is often considered to influence running economy (RE) and thus, running performance. However, previous results are mixed and LBS levels have not been studied in advanced footwear technology (AFT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of increased LBS from curved carbon fiber plates embedded within an AFT midsole compared to a traditional running shoe on RE and spatiotemporal parameters.
Methods: Twenty-one male trained runners completed three times 4 min at 13 km/h with two experimental shoe models with a curved carbon fiber plate embedded in an AFT midsole with different LBS values (Stiff: 35.5 N/mm and Stiffest: 43.1 N/mm), and a Control condition (no carbon fiber plate: 20.1 N/mm). We measured energy cost of running (W/kg) and spatiotemporal parameters in one visit.
Results: RE improved for the Stiff shoe condition (15.71 ± 0.95 W/kg; p < 0.001; n 2  = 0.374) compared to the Control condition (16.13 ± 1.08 W/kg; 2.56%) and Stiffest condition (16.03 ± 1.19 W/kg; 1.98%). However, we found no significant differences between the Stiffest and Control conditions. Moreover, there were no spatiotemporal differences between shoe conditions.
Conclusion: Changes in LBS in AFT influences RE suggesting that moderately stiff shoes have the most effective LBS to improve RE in AFT compared to very stiff shoes and traditional, flexible shoe conditions while running at 13 km/h.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: