A comparison of Bayesian and score methods for interval estimates of positive/negative likelihood ratios in support of diagnostic device performance evaluation.

Autor:	Hu T; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), CDRH, USFDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA., Sahiner B; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), CDRH, USFDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA., Petrick N; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), CDRH, USFDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA., Cha K; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), CDRH, USFDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA., Wen S; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), CDRH, USFDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA., Pennello G; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), CDRH, USFDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics [J Biopharm Stat] 2024 Jun 18, pp. 1-19. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 18.
DOI:	10.1080/10543406.2024.2364723
Abstrakt:	Background: Positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR) are important metrics of accuracy for diagnostic devices with a binary output. However, the properties of Bayesian and frequentist interval estimators of PLR/NLR have not been extensively studied and compared. In this study, we explore the potential use of the Bayesian method for interval estimation of PLR/NLR, and, more broadly, for interval estimation of the ratio of two independent proportions. Methods: We develop a Bayesian-based approach for interval estimation of PLR/NLR for use as a part of a diagnostic device performance evaluation. Our approach is applicable to a broader setting for interval estimation of any ratio of two independent proportions. We compare score and Bayesian interval estimators for the ratio of two proportions in terms of the coverage probability (CP) and expected interval width (EW) via extensive experiments and applications to two case studies. A supplementary experiment was also conducted to assess the performance of the proposed exact Bayesian method under different priors. Results: Our experimental results show that the overall mean CP for Bayesian interval estimation is consistent with that for the score method (0.950 vs. 0.952), and the overall mean EW for Bayesian is shorter than that for score method (15.929 vs. 19.724). Application to two case studies showed that the intervals estimated using the Bayesian and frequentist approaches are very similar. Discussion: Our numerical results indicate that the proposed Bayesian approach has a comparable CP performance with the score method while yielding higher precision (i.e. a shorter EW).
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu