| Autor: |
Kafle B; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no.; Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P. O. Box 5003, Ås, N-1432, Norway., Wubshet SG; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no., Hestnes Bakke KA; SINTEF, P. O. Box 124 Blindern, Oslo, N-0314, Norway., Böcker U; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no., O'Farrell M; SINTEF, P. O. Box 124 Blindern, Oslo, N-0314, Norway., Dankel K; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no., Måge I; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no., Tschudi J; SINTEF, P. O. Box 124 Blindern, Oslo, N-0314, Norway., Tzimorotas D; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no., Afseth NK; Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (NOFIMA), P. O. Box 210, Ås, N-1431, Norway. bijay.kafle@nofima.no., Dunker T; SINTEF, P. O. Box 124 Blindern, Oslo, N-0314, Norway. |
| Abstrakt: |
The main objective of this study was to design, build, and test a compact, multi-well, portable dry film FTIR system for industrial food and bioprocess applications. The system features dry film sampling on a circular rotating disc comprising 31 wells, a design that was chosen to simplify potential automation and robotic sample handling at a later stage. Calibration models for average molecular weight (AMW, 200 samples) and collagen content (68 samples) were developed from the measurements of industrially produced protein hydrolysate samples in a controlled laboratory environment. Similarly, calibration models for the prediction of lactate content in samples from cultivation media (59 samples) were also developed. The portable dry film FTIR system showed reliable model characteristics which were benchmarked with a benchtop FTIR system. Subsequently, the portable dry film FTIR system was deployed in a bioprocessing plant, and protein hydrolysate samples were measured at-line in an industrial environment. This industrial testing involved building a calibration model for predicting AMW using 60 protein hydrolysate samples measured at-line using the portable dry film FTIR system and subsequent model validation using a test set of 26 samples. The industrial calibration in terms of coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.94), root mean square of cross-validation (RMSECV = 194 g mol -1 ), and root mean square of prediction (RMSEP = 162 g mol -1 ) demonstrated low prediction errors as compared to benchtop FTIR measurements, with no statistical difference between the calibration models of the two FTIR systems. This is to the authors' knowledge the first study for developing and employing a portable dry film FTIR system in the enzymatic protein hydrolysis industry for successful at-line measurements of protein hydrolysate samples. The study therefore suggests that the portable dry film FTIR instrument has huge potential for in/at-line applications in the food and bioprocessing industries. |
