Decentralized HIV testing: comparing peer and mail-based distribution strategies to improve the reach of HIV self-testing among people who use drugs in Florida.

Autor: Eger WH; School of Social Work, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.; School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA., Mutchler A; Florida Harm Reduction Collective, St. Petersburg, FL, USA., Santamour T; Florida Harm Reduction Collective, St. Petersburg, FL, USA., Meaders S; Florida Harm Reduction Collective, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.; Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA., Pines HA; School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.; Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA., Bazzi AR; Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.; Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA., Tookes HE; Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA., Bartholomew TS; Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. tsb61@miami.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Harm reduction journal [Harm Reduct J] 2024 Jun 17; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 116. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 17.
DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01031-9
Abstrakt: Introduction: People who use drugs (PWUD) are at increased risk for HIV infection. HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a promising method for identifying new infections, but optimal distribution strategies remain understudied.
Methods: To characterize PWUD by HIVST distribution strategy (peers vs. mail), we examined data from July 2022 to June 2023 collected from a real-world HIVST program led by the non-profit, Florida Harm Reduction Collective. We used descriptive statistics and Poisson regressions with robust error variance to compare those who received HIVST through peers or via mail by socio-demographics, Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) county designation, and HIV testing experience.
Results: Among 728 participants, 78% received HIVST from peers, 47% identified as cisgender female, 48% as heterosexual, and 45% as non-White; 66% resided in an EHE county, and 55% had no HIV testing experience. Compared to those who received an HIV self-test from peers, those who received tests via mail were less likely to be cisgender male (vs. cisgender female; prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43, 0.81), non-Hispanic Black (vs. non-Hispanic White; PR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.89) or from EHE counties (vs. non-EHE counties; PR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.44). Those who received tests via mail were also more likely to identify their sexual orientation as "Other/Undisclosed" (vs. straight/heterosexual; PR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.51, 2.66).
Conclusion: Our findings support the role of community-based HIVST distribution strategies in increasing HIV testing coverage among PWUD. Additional research could help inform the equitable reach of HIVST.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: