Cling together, swing together? Assessing indirect retrieval of stimulus-response bindings for associated stimuli.
Autor: | Arunkumar M; Department of General Psychology II, Institute for Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Am Steiger 3/Haus 1, 07743, Jena, Germany. mrudula.arunkumar@uni-jena.de., Rothermund K; Department of General Psychology II, Institute for Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Am Steiger 3/Haus 1, 07743, Jena, Germany., Kunde W; Department of Psychology III, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany., Mocke V; Department of Psychology III, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany., Giesen CG; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Health and Medical University Erfurt, Am Anger, 64-73, 99084, Erfurt, Germany. carina.giesen@hmu-erfurt.de. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2024 Dec; Vol. 31 (6), pp. 2832-2843. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 14. |
DOI: | 10.3758/s13423-024-02525-0 |
Abstrakt: | When a stimulus is paired with a response, a stimulus-response (SR) binding (or event file) is formed. Subsequent stimulus repetition retrieves the SR binding from memory, which facilitates (impedes) performance when the same (a different) response is required. We aimed to explore whether indirect retrieval of SR bindings by a newly learnt associated stimulus is possible. Participants first went through a learning task to acquire novel stimulus-stimulus associations. The same stimulus pairs were then presented in a prime-probe task to assess direct and indirect retrieval effects. Participants responded by classifying word color in prime and probe trials. Probe words were either identical to prime words (test for direct retrieval) or corresponded to the associated stimulus (test for indirect retrieval) or were unrelated words (baseline). Independently of word relation, response relation (repetition vs. change) across prime and probe trials was manipulated. In two highly powered preregistered studies (total N = 260) using different types of stimulus associations, we obtained evidence for direct retrieval due to identical word repetition in the probe. Crucially, evidence for indirect retrieval upon presentation of an associated probe word was absent. Controlling for memory of each stimulus-stimulus association did not alter the findings. Our results show that indirect retrieval through newly acquired associations does not occur at the level of SR bindings, at least not for recently acquired stimulus-stimulus associations. Our study illustrates the scope of binding principles and highlights boundary conditions for the stimulus properties that can elicit automatic response retrieval. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |