Open Retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole Mesh Placement for Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Autor:	Maskal SM; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Ellis RC; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Fafaj A; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Costanzo A; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Thomas JD; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston., Prabhu AS; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Krpata DM; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Beffa LRA; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Tu C; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Zheng X; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York., Miller BT; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Rosen MJ; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Petro CC; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	JAMA surgery [JAMA Surg] 2024 Sep 01; Vol. 159 (9), pp. 982-989.
DOI:	10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1686
Abstrakt:	Importance: Durable parastomal hernia repair remains elusive. There is limited evidence comparing the durability of the open retromuscular Sugarbaker and keyhole mesh configurations. Objective: To determine if the open retromuscular Sugarbaker mesh placement technique would lower parastomal hernia recurrence rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-center, randomized clinical trial, 150 patients with a permanent stoma and associated parastomal hernia who were candidates for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair were enrolled and randomized from April 2019 to April 2022 and followed up for 2 years. Interventions: Following intraoperative assessment to determine the feasibility of either technique, enrolled patients were randomized to receive either retromuscular Sugarbaker or keyhole synthetic mesh placement. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was parastomal hernia recurrence at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, wound complications, reoperations, as well as patient-reported pain, abdominal wall-specific quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, and decision regret at 1 year and 2 years. Results: A total of 150 patients were randomized, and with 91% follow-up at 2 years, there were 13 (17%) parastomal hernia recurrences in the retromuscular Sugarbaker arm and 18 (24%) in the keyhole arm (adjusted risk difference, -0.029; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.153, and adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.69). There were no statistically significant differences between the Sugarbaker and keyhole groups regarding reoperations for recurrence (2 vs 7, respectively), nonhernia intra-abdominal pathology (4 vs 10, respectively), stoma necrosis (1 vs 0, respectively), mesh-related complications (4 vs 1, respectively), patient-reported pain, abdominal wall-specific quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, and decision regret at any time point. Conclusions and Relevance: In the setting of open parastomal hernia repair, a retromuscular Sugarbaker mesh placement technique was not superior to a keyhole configuration 2 years after repair. Further innovation is necessary to improve parastomal hernia repair outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03972553.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu