Transparency and Reproducibility in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.
Autor: | Lopez DA; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.; Center for Mental Health Innovation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon., Cardenas-Iniguez C; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California., Subramaniam P; Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah., Adise S; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California., Bottenhorn KL; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California., Badilla P; Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado., Mukwekwerere E; Department of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri., Tally L; Center for Children and Families and Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida., Ahanmisi O; Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland., Bedichek IL; Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia., Matera SD; The Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York., Perez-Tamayo GM; Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah., Sissons N; Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont., Winters O; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina., Harkness A; Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California., Nakiyingi E; Department of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri., Encizo J; Department of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri., Xiang Z; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut., Wilson IG; Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin., Smith AN; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan., Hill AR; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon., Adames AK; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California., Robertson E; Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina., Boughter JR; Department of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri., Lopez-Flores A; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon., Skoler ER; Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado., Dorholt L; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Nagel BJ; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.; Center for Mental Health Innovation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon., Huber RS; Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.; Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.; Center for Mental Health Innovation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | MedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences [medRxiv] 2024 May 31. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 31. |
DOI: | 10.1101/2024.05.30.24308222 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Transparency can build trust in the scientific process, but scientific findings can be undermined by poor and obscure data use and reporting practices. The purpose of this work is to report how data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study has been used to date, and to provide practical recommendations on how to improve the transparency and reproducibility of findings. Methods: Articles published from 2017 to 2023 that used ABCD Study data were reviewed using more than 30 data extraction items to gather information on data use practices. Total frequencies were reported for each extraction item, along with computation of a Level of Completeness (LOC) score that represented overall endorsement of extraction items. Univariate linear regression models were used to examine the correlation between LOC scores and individual extraction items. Post hoc analysis included examination of whether LOC scores were correlated with the logged 2-year journal impact factor. Results: There were 549 full-length articles included in the main analysis. Analytic scripts were shared in 30% of full-length articles. The number of participants excluded due to missing data was reported in 60% of articles, and information on missing data for individual variables (e.g., household income) was provided in 38% of articles. A table describing the analytic sample was included in 83% of articles. A race and/or ethnicity variable was included in 78% of reviewed articles, while its inclusion was justified in only 41% of these articles. LOC scores were highly correlated with extraction items related to examination of missing data. A bottom 10% of LOC score was significantly correlated with a lower logged journal impact factor when compared to the top 10% of LOC scores (β=-0.77, 95% -1.02, -0.51; p -value < 0.0001). Conclusion: These findings highlight opportunities for improvement in future papers using ABCD Study data to readily adapt analytic practices for better transparency and reproducibility efforts. A list of recommendations is provided to facilitate adherence in future research. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |