Debriefer cognitive load during Traditional Reflective Debriefing vs. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice interdisciplinary team training.

Autor: Wiltrakis S; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. susanwiltrakis@wustl.edu., Hwu R; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA., Holmes S; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA., Iyer S; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA., Goodwin N; Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA., Mathai C; Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA., Gillespie S; Department of Biostatistics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA., Hebbar KB; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA., Colman N; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Advances in simulation (London, England) [Adv Simul (Lond)] 2024 Jun 04; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 04.
DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00296-1
Abstrakt: Background: Cognitive load impacts performance of debriefers and learners during simulations, but limited data exists examining debriefer cognitive load. The aim of this study is to compare the cognitive load of the debriefers during simulation-based team training (SbTT) with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) debriefing and Traditional Reflective Debriefing (TRD). We hypothesize that cognitive load will be reduced during RCDP compared to TRD.
Methods: This study was part of a large-scale, interdisciplinary team training program at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Egleston Pediatric Emergency Department, with 164 learners (physicians, nurses, medical technicians, paramedics, and respiratory therapists (RTs)). Eight debriefers (main facilitators and discipline-specific coaches) led 28 workshops, which were quasi-randomized to either RCDP or TRD. Each session began with a baseline medical resuscitation scenario and cognitive load measurement using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), and the NASA TLX was repeated immediately following either TRD or RCDP debriefing. Raw scores of the NASA TLX before and after intervention were compared. ANOVA tests were used to compare differences in NASA TLX scores before and after intervention between the RCDP and TRD groups.
Results: For all debriefers, mean NASA TLX scores for physical demands and frustration significantly decreased (- 0.8, p = 0.004 and - 1.3, p = 0.002) in TRD and mean perceived performance success significantly increased (+ 2.4, p < 0.001). For RCDP, perceived performance success increased post-debriefing (+ 3.6, p < 0.001), time demands decreased (- 1.0, p = 0.04), and frustration decreased (- 2.0, p < 0.001). Comparing TRD directly to RCDP, perceived performance success was greater in RCDP than TRD (3.6 vs. 2.4, p = 0.04). Main facilitators had lower effort and mental demand in RCDP and greater perceived success (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: RCDP had greater perceived success than TRD for debriefers. Main facilitators also report reduced effort and baseline mental demand in RCDP. For less experienced debriefers, newer simulation programs, or large team training sessions such as our study, RCDP may be a less mentally demanding debriefing methodology for facilitators.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: