Evaluation of long-term supplementation of a Bacillus subtilis direct-fed microbial and enzymatically hydrolyzed yeast cell culture product used alone or in combination on Clostridia, Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella prevalence in beef steers.

Autor:	DeHaan ER; Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA., Thompson J; Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, Church and Dwight Company, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA., Rusche WC; Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA., de Jesus M; Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, Church and Dwight Company, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA., Block E; Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, Church and Dwight Company, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA., Rehberger T; Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition, Church and Dwight Company, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA., Smith ZK; Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of animal science [J Anim Sci] 2024 Jan 03; Vol. 102.
DOI:	10.1093/jas/skae156
Abstrakt:	The objective was to determine the influence of long-term supplementation (258 d) of a direct-fed microbial (DFM) and/or yeast cell wall (YCW) product on bacterial populations in beef steers. Single-sourced Charolais × Red Angus steers (n = 256; body weight = 246 ± 1.68 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design and blocked by location into one of four treatments: 1) fed no DFM and no YCW (Control); 2) fed only the DFM (DFM; Certillus CP B1801 Dry, 28 g/steer d-1 ); 3) fed only the YCW (YCW; Celmanax; 18 g/steer d-1 ); and 4) fed the DFM and the YCW (DFM+YCW). Steers were vaccinated for respiratory and clostridial diseases and treated for internal and external parasites at processing and individually weighed on days 1, 14, 42, 77, 105, 133, 161, 182, 230, and 258. To determine bacterial prevalence, fecal samples were collected on days 1, 14, 77, 133, 182, and 230 and environmental (pen area, feed, and water) samples were collected at the beginning of the week when cattle were weighed. No treatment × day interactions or treatment effects (P > 0.05) were observed between treatment groups at any sampling days for the bacterial populations. Samples on days 1, 133, and 182 had greater (P < 0.05) Clostridia levels compared to the other sampling points but were not different from each other. Clostridia levels were also greater (P < 0.05) on day 77 compared to days 14 and 230. Samples on days 77 and 230 had greater (P < 0.05) Clostridium perfringens levels compared to the other sampling points but were not different (P > 0.05) from each other. Samples on days 1 and 14 had lower (P < 0.05) total Escherichia coli levels compared to the other sampling points but were not different (P > 0.05) from each other. Escherichia coli levels on day 77 were higher (P < 0.05) compared to days 133, 182, and 230. Little Salmonella prevalence (1.5%) was observed throughout the study. This study had greater levels of Clostridia compared to small and large commercial feedlots in the Church and Dwight research database, but C. perfringens, total and pathogenic E. coli, and Salmonella prevalence were notably lower. Collectively, there were no appreciable treatment influences on bacterial populations. These data further indicate a low pathogenic bacterial challenge at the trial site, which could partially explain the lack of differences with DFM or YCW supplementation. The DFM and YCW used alone or in combination cannot be expected to show additional benefits when animals are relatively unstressed with a low pathogenic bacterial challenge. (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu