Application of 3D‑printed porous titanium interbody fusion cage vs. polyether ether ketone interbody fusion cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis update.

Autor: Zhai WJ; Graduate School, The First Clinical College of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China.; Department of Orthopedics, Changzhi Yunfeng Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China., Liu L; Graduate School, The First Clinical College of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China., Gao YH; Graduate School, The First Clinical College of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China.; Department of Orthopedics, Changzhi Yunfeng Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China., Qin SL; Department of Orthopedics, Changzhi Yunfeng Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China.; Department of Orthopedics, Changzhi Institution of Spinal Disease, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China., Han PF; Department of Orthopedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China., Xu YF; Department of Orthopedics, Changzhi Yunfeng Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China.; Department of Orthopedics, Changzhi Institution of Spinal Disease, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Experimental and therapeutic medicine [Exp Ther Med] 2024 May 21; Vol. 28 (1), pp. 290. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 21 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12579
Abstrakt: The present study aimed to compare the differences between 3D-printed porous titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Literature on the application of 3D-printed porous titanium and PEEK interbody fusion cages for ACDF was searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and VIP databases. A total of 1,181 articles were retrieved and 12 were finally included. The Cochrane bias risk assessment criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used for quality evaluation and Review Manager 5.4 was used for data analysis. The 3D cage group was superior to the PEEK cage group in terms of operative time [mean difference (MD): -7.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.08, -4.29; P<0.00001], intraoperative blood loss (MD: -6.17; 95%CI: -10.56, -1.78; P=0.006), hospitalization time (MD: -0.57; 95%CI: -0.86, -0.28: P=0.0001), postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR): 0.35; 95%CI: 0.15, 0.80; P=0.01], C2-7 Cobb angle (MD: 2.85; 95%CI: 1.45, 4.24; P<0.0001), intervertebral space height (MD: 1.20; 95%CI: 0.54, 1.87; P=0.0004), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Assessment of Treatment (MD: 0.69; 95%CI: 0.24, 1.15; P=0.003) and visual analogue scale score (MD: -0.43; 95%CI: -0.78, -0.07; P=0.02). The difference was statistically significant, while there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of fusion rate (OR: 1.74; 95%CI: 0.71, 4.27; P=0.23). The use of 3D-printed porous titanium interbody fusion cage in ACDF has the advantages of short operation time, less bleeding loss, shorter hospitalization time and fewer postoperative complications. It can better maintain the cervical curvature and intervertebral height, relieve pain and accelerate postoperative functional recovery.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
(Copyright: © 2024 Zhai et al.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje