Standardisation facilitates reliable interpretation of ETCO 2 during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Autor: Gutiérrez JJ; Group of Signal and Communications. University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain., Urigüen JA; Group of Signal and Communications. University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain; Department of Applied Mathematics, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain. Electronic address: joseantonio.uriguen@ehu.eus., Leturiondo M; Group of Signal and Communications. University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain., Sandoval CL; Unidades Tecnológicas de Santander Bucaramanga, Colombia., Redondo K; Group of Signal and Communications. University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain., Russell JK; Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine (CPR-EM), Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR, USA., Daya MR; Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine (CPR-EM), Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR, USA., Ruiz de Gauna S; Group of Signal and Communications. University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Resuscitation [Resuscitation] 2024 Jul; Vol. 200, pp. 110259. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 31.
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110259
Abstrakt: Background: Interpretation of end-tidal CO 2 (ETCO 2 ) during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is affected by variations in ventilation and chest compressions. This study investigates the impact of standardising ETCO 2 to constant ventilation rate (VR) and compression depth (CD) on absolute values and trends.
Methods: Retrospective study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases with manual CPR, including defibrillator and clinical data. ETCO 2 , VR and CD values were averaged by minute. ETCO 2 was standardised to 10 vpm and 50 mm. We compared standardised (ET s ) and measured (ET m ) values and trends during resuscitation.
Results: Of 1,036 cases, 287 met the inclusion criteria. VR was mostly lower than recommended, 8.8 vpm, and highly variable within and among patients. CD was mostly within guidelines, 49.8 mm, and less varied. ET s was lower than ET m by 7.3 mmHg. ET s emphasized differences by sex (22.4 females vs. 25.6 mmHg males), initial rhythm (29.1 shockable vs. 22.7 mmHg not), intubation type (25.6 supraglottic vs. 22.4 mmHg endotracheal) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achieved (34.5 mmHg) vs. not (20.1 mmHg). Trends were different between non-ROSC and ROSC patients before ROSC (-0.3 vs. + 0.2 mmHg/min), and between sustained and rearrest after ROSC (-0.7 vs. -2.1 mmHg/min). Peak ET s was higher for sustained than for rearrest (53.0 vs. 42.5 mmHg).
Conclusion: Standardising ETCO 2 eliminates effects of VR and CD variations during manual CPR and facilitates comparison of values and trends among and within patients. Its clinical application for guidance of resuscitation warrants further investigation.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: