The prospective relationship between a-priori intentions for and patterns of e-cigarette use among adults who smoke cigarettes.
Autor: | O'Neal RA; Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, United States., Carpenter MJ; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), United States; Department of Public Health Sciences, MUSC, United States; Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, United States., Wahlquist AE; Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, United States., Leavens ELS; Department of Population Health, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, United States; The University of Kansas Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States., Smith TT; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), United States; Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, United States., Fahey MC; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), United States. Electronic address: faheym@musc.edu. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Addictive behaviors [Addict Behav] 2024 Sep; Vol. 156, pp. 108067. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 26. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108067 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Electronic (e-)cigarettes may help adult cigarette smokers achieve cigarette cessation, depending on patterns of e-cigarette use. Among cigarette smokers who do not use e-cigarettes, it is unclear if and how a-priori intentions for use are related to uptake patterns. Longitudinal studies have focused on established e-cigarette users or adolescent and young adult populations exclusively. Methods: Within a nationwide randomized clinical trial (N = 638), adult cigarette smokers not currently using e-cigarettes were randomized (2:1) to receive (or not) one-month sampling of e-cigarettes. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on an established 15-item measure assessing a-priori intentions for e-cigarette use to identify latent variables. Among those receiving e-cigarette products, regression models examined relationships between intentions and: 1) uptake (yes/no), 2) frequency (number of days per week), and 3) amount (puffing episodes per day) of e-cigarette use at one-month follow-up. Results: Two factors emerged from the EFA: 1) cigarette-related intentions (e.g., cigarette cessation, no smell) and 2) novel appeal of e-cigarettes (e.g., flavors). Three items remained and were treated as separate intentions: "feels like cigarette smoking", "curiosity", and "affordability". In the final multivariable models, "feel like cigarette smoking" predicted more frequent e-cigarette use (β = 0.187, SE = 0.086, p = 0.03); however, none of the five factors/intentions were significantly associated with uptake or amount of use. Conclusions: For adult cigarette smokers not currently using e-cigarettes, a-priori intentions for using e-cigarettes might not be predictive of if or how these products will be used in the future, suggesting that motives may not drive use behavior. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |