| Autor: |
Taillieu R; UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CANADA., Weiss MJ; CENTRE MÈRE-ENFANT SOLEIL DU CHU DE QUÉBEC, QUEBEC CITY, CANADA., Harvey D; UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM, NOTTINGHAM, U.K., Murphy N; WESTERN UNIVERSITY, LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA., Weijer C; WESTERN UNIVERSITY, LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA., Chandler JA; UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CANADA. |
| Abstrakt: |
The administration of Pre-Mortem Interventions (PMIs) to preserve the opportunity to donate, to assess the eligibility to donate, or to optimize the outcomes of donation and transplantation are controversial as they offer no direct medical benefit and include at least the possibility of harm to the still-living patient. In this article, we describe the legal analysis surrounding consent to PMIs, drawing on existing legal commentary and identifying key legal problems. We provide an overview of the approaches in several jurisdictions that have chosen to explicitly address PMIs within codified law. We then provide, as an example, a detailed exploration of how PMIs are likely to be addressed in one jurisdiction where general medical consent law applies because there is no specific legislation addressing PMIs - the province of Ontario in Canada. |
