Assessing the multifaceted cervix: examining cervical gland area at cervical length screening to predict spontaneous preterm birth.

Autor: Meyer JA; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Meyer). Electronic address: Jessica.Meyer@nyulangone.org., Limaye M; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Limaye, Roman, Brubaker, Mehta-Lee)., Roman AS; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Limaye, Roman, Brubaker, Mehta-Lee)., Brubaker SG; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Limaye, Roman, Brubaker, Mehta-Lee)., Mehta-Lee S; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (Drs Limaye, Roman, Brubaker, Mehta-Lee).
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM [Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM] 2024 Jul; Vol. 6 (7), pp. 101390. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 28.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101390
Abstrakt: Background: Biologically active cervical glands provide a mucous barrier while influencing the composition and biomechanical strength of the cervical extracellular matrix. Cervical remodeling during ripening may be reflected as loss of the sonographic cervical gland area. As sonographic cervical length remains suboptimal for universal screening, adjunctive evaluation of other facets of the mid-trimester cervix may impart additional screening benefit.
Objective: To sonographically assess the cervical gland area at universal cervical length screening for preterm birth.
Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of singletons with transvaginal cervical length screening universally performed during anatomic survey between 18 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks and subsequent live delivery at a single institution in 2018. Uterine anomalies, cerclage, suboptimal imaging, or medically indicated preterm birth were excluded. Ultrasound images were assessed for cervical length and cervical gland area (with quantitative measurements when present). The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks. Absent and present gland groups were compared using χ2, Fisher's exact, T-test, and multivariate logistic regression (adjusting for parity and progesterone use, as well as the gestational age, cervical length, and gland absence at screening ultrasound). Gland measurements were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney-U Test and Spearman's correlation.
Results: Among the cohort of 772 patients, absent and present CGA groups were overall similar. Patients were on average 33 years old, ∼20 weeks gestation at screening ultrasound, and overall, 2.5% had history of prior spontaneous preterm birth. The absent gland group was more likely to have been taking progesterone (17% vs 4%, P=.04). Overall rate of preterm birth was 2.6%. However, the 2.3% of patients with absent cervical gland area were significantly more likely to deliver <37 weeks (aOR 23.9, 95% CI 6.4-89, P<.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated better performance of a cervical length screening model for preterm birth prediction with the addition of qualitative gland evaluation (P<.001). Qualitative gland assessment was reproducible (PABAK 0.89), but quantitative gland measurements did not correlate with preterm birth.
Conclusion: Qualitative gland absence at mid-gestation cervical length screening was associated with subsequent spontaneous preterm birth, whereas quantitative gland measurements were not. Multifaceted ultrasound screening may be needed to adequately evaluate the multiple biologic functions of the cervix.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: