Implementing an Organizational Culture of Biosafety and Biosecurity in the ŞAP Institute.

Autor: Tuncer-Göktuna P; Pelin Tuncer-Göktuna, PhD, is an Associate Professor, Viral Vaccines Production Lab and Sheep and Goat Poxvirus National Reference Lab, Pendik Veterinary Control Institute, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Istanbul, Türkiye., Fontes BA; Benjamin A. Fontes, is a Senior Associate Director and Biosafety Officer, Environmental Health Safety, Yale University, New Haven, CT., Çokçalışkan C; Can Çokçalışkan, PhD, is Researcher, at the ŞAP (Foot-and-Mouth Disease) Institute, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Türkiye., Asar E; Erdoğan Asar, PhD is an Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Informatics, Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye., Karakaya M; Mehmet Karakaya, is Researcher, at the ŞAP (Foot-and-Mouth Disease) Institute, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Türkiye.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Health security [Health Secur] 2024 Aug; Vol. 22 (4), pp. 271-280. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 30.
DOI: 10.1089/hs.2023.0044
Abstrakt: An organizational culture of biosafety and biosecurity is critical for effective management of transboundary animal diseases. One essential aspect of this work is keeping important pathogens studied in veterinary laboratories under control. Türkiye is among the countries that are both endemic and disease-free for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus, and it has a unique institute dedicated to FMD diagnosis, control, and vaccine production. To build an organizational safety culture within this institute and strengthen awareness of the importance of safe and secure handling of FMD, 4 staff members previously trained in biorisk management developed and provided trainings to all institute staff. The institute's 173 personnel were divided into 3 groups by job description based on direct or indirect work with FMD virus. All 3 groups received training that addressed biosecurity, biosafety, biorisk awareness, and insider threat; the trainings varied in length by group. Three-quarters (n=130, 75%) of all institute staff completed their training and were asked to complete knowledge surveys using a Likert scale survey before and after their training. A majority (n=104, 80%) of those participants completed both the pretraining and posttraining surveys. All 3 training groups' posttraining surveys showed improved awareness above baseline scores, and all 3 groups scores reached the targeted threshold goal. Group 2 demonstrated a realization that some of the knowledge and habits they had acquired through experience were incorrect. Scores for several individual questions decreased at posttraining, and these results will need further evaluation. The overall training results prompted the institute to provide periodic updates to employees to sustain the organizational safety culture. With this study, the institute now has a dedicated group of biorisk management representatives. This work serves as a wake-up call for established institutions that rely on staff experience to foster an organizational culture of biosafety and biosecurity.
Databáze: MEDLINE