Comparison of De-Torque and Failure Load Evaluation of Selective-Laser-Sintered CoCr, CAD-CAM ZrO, and Machined Implant Abutment/Restoration.

Autor: Vohra F; Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12485-6541, Saudi Arabia., Alsaif R; Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12485-6541, Saudi Arabia., Khan R; Engineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12485-6541, Saudi Arabia., Bukhari IA; Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 12485-6541, Saudi Arabia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) [Bioengineering (Basel)] 2024 Apr 30; Vol. 11 (5). Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 30.
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050448
Abstrakt: Aim: This study aimed to compare the torque loss, fracture load, compressive strength, and failure types of selective-laser-sintered cobalt chromium (SLM-Co-Cr), computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing zirconium oxide (CAD-CAM-ZrO), and machined titanium (Ti) implant abutments.
Methods: Thirty endosseous dental implants were vertically embedded with machined Ti (control group), CAD-CAM-ZrO, and SLM-Co-Cr abutments. Abutment fabrication involved CAD-CAM milling and SLM technology. The de-torque assessment included preload reverse torque values (RTVs), cyclic loading, and post-RTVs using a customized protocol. Fracture load assessment employed ISO-14801 standards, and statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey Post hoc tests ( p < 0.05).
Results: In pre-load RTVs, SLM-Co-Cr showed the lowest mean torque loss (24.30 ± 2.13), followed by machined Ti (27.33 ± 2.74) and CAD-CAM-ZrO (22.07 ± 2.20). Post-load RTVs decreased for all groups. Fracture load and compressive strength were highest for SLM-Co-Cr, with significant differences among groups ( p < 0.001). Fracture types included abutment failures in SLM-Co-Cr and machined Ti, while CAD-CAM-ZrO exhibited crown separation with deformation.
Conclusion: SLM-Co-Cr-fabricated implant abutments exhibited superior stability and resistance to rotational forces, higher fracture loads, and greater compressive strength compared to CAD-CAM-ZrO and machined Ti.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje