Biomechanical assessment of mandibular fracture fixation using finite element analysis validated by polymeric mandible mechanical testing.
Autor: | Daqiq O; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. o.daqiq@umcg.nl., Roossien CC; Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen, Department of Bio-Inspired MEMS and Biomedical Devices, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands., Wubs FW; Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands., van Minnen B; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2024 May 23; Vol. 14 (1), pp. 11795. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 23. |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-024-62011-4 |
Abstrakt: | The clinical finite element analysis (FEA) application in maxillofacial surgery for mandibular fracture is limited due to the lack of a validated FEA model. Therefore, this study aims to develop a validated FEA model for mandibular fracture treatment, by assessing non-comminuted mandibular fracture fixation. FEA models were created for mandibles with single simple symphysis, parasymphysis, and angle fractures; fixated with 2.0 mm 4-hole titanium miniplates located at three different configurations with clinically known differences in stability, namely: superior border, inferior border, and two plate combinations. The FEA models were validated with series of Synbone polymeric mandible mechanical testing (PMMT) using a mechanical test bench with an identical test set-up. The first outcome was that the current understanding of stable simple mandibular fracture fixation was reproducible in both the FEA and PMMT. Optimal fracture stability was achieved with the two plate combination, followed by superior border, and then inferior border plating. Second, the FEA and the PMMT findings were consistent and comparable (a total displacement difference of 1.13 mm). In conclusion, the FEA and the PMMT outcomes were similar, and hence suitable for simple mandibular fracture treatment analyses. The FEA model can possibly be applied for non-routine complex mandibular fracture management. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |