An interactive, online decision aid assessing patient goals and preferences for treatment of aortic stenosis to support physician-led shared decision-making: Early feasibility pilot study.
Autor: | Coylewright M; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine-Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States of America., Otero D; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America., Lindman BR; Structural Heart and Valve Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America., Levack MM; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America., Horne A Jr; Department of Medicine, Summit Health, Berkeley Heights, NJ, United States of America., Ngo LH; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America., Beaudry M; Central Vermont Medical Center, Berlin, Vermont, United States of America., Col HV; Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America., Col NF; Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME and University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States of America. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 May 21; Vol. 19 (5), pp. e0302378. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 21 (Print Publication: 2024). |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0302378 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Guidelines recommend shared decision making when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis but implementation has lagged. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a novel decision aid for severe aortic stenosis at point-of-care. Methods: This prospective multi-site pilot cohort study included adults with severe aortic stenosis and their clinicians. Patients were referred by their heart team when scheduled to discuss treatment options. Outcomes included shared decision-making processes, communication quality, decision-making confidence, decisional conflict, knowledge, stage of decision making, decision quality, and perceptions of the tool. Patients were assessed at baseline (T0), after using the intervention (T1), and after the clinical encounter (T2); clinicians were assessed at T2. Before the encounter, patients reviewed the intervention, Aortic Valve Improved Treatment Approaches (AVITA), an interactive, online decision aid. AVITA presents options, frames decisions, clarifies patient goals and values, and generates a summary to use with clinicians during the encounter. Results: 30 patients (9 women [30.0%]; mean [SD] age 70.4 years [11.0]) and 14 clinicians (4 women [28.6%], 7 cardiothoracic surgeons [50%]) comprised 28 clinical encounters Most patients [85.7%] and clinicians [84.6%] endorsed AVITA. Patients reported AVITA easy to use [89.3%] and helped them choose treatment [95.5%]. Clinicians reported the AVITA summary helped them understand their patients' values [80.8%] and make values-aligned recommendations [61.5%]. Patient knowledge significantly improved at T1 and T2 (p = 0.004). Decisional conflict, decision-making stage, and decision quality improved at T2 (p = 0.0001, 0.0005, and 0.083, respectively). Most patients [60%] changed treatment preference between T0 and T2. Initial treatment preferences were associated with low knowledge, high decisional conflict, and poor decision quality; final preferences were associated with high knowledge, low conflict, and high quality. Conclusions: AVITA was endorsed by patients and clinicians, easy to use, improved shared decision-making quality and helped patients and clinicians arrive at a treatment that reflected patients' values. Trial Registration: Trial ID: NCT04755426, Clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426. Competing Interests: I would like to disclose the following competing interests: Dr. Col has received research grants and contracts from Edwards Lifesciences. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. (Copyright: © 2024 Coylewright et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |