Guiding the Implementation of Wastewater-based Surveillance for Carceral Infection Control with Perspectives from People with Lived Experience of Incarceration during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Autor:	Brown VM; Emory University., Ogutu EA; Emory University., Kauffman AE; Emory University., Kennedy SS; Emory University., Tenner RA; Tufts Medince., Wurcel AG; Tufts Medince., Zawitz CJ; Cook County Health., Spaulding AC; Emory University., Akiyama MJ; Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Research square [Res Sq] 2024 May 08. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 08.
DOI:	10.21203/rs.3.rs-4214768/v1
Abstrakt:	Background: Little guidance exists on best practices for implementing and sustaining wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) for SARS-CoV-2 in carceral settings. To ensure alignment with priorities of stakeholders, we aimed to understand the perspectives of persons with lived experience (PLE) of jail who were incarcerated during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic on infection control. Methods: We recruited two PLE at each of four jails: Cook County (IL), Fulton County (GA), Middlesex County (MA), and Washington DC. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) guides followed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Two FGDs focusing on lived experience with jail infection control protocol and WBS were conducted, and six Key Informant (KI) interviews followed to gain insights on communicating WBS results. We used a combination of deductive thematic analysis based on CFIR constructs and inductive analysis to capture emergent themes. Results: Themes from FGDs included: (1) variable experiences with COVID-19 infection control protocols including intake processes, individual testing, isolation and quarantine, (2) the perceived attitudes of fellow residents and staff surrounding COVID-19 mitigation in a carceral setting; and (3) perceived benefits and challenges involving WBS implementation and messaging. KIs emphasized 1) The importance of straightforward health messaging and trustworthiness in the communication of WBS results, 2) Support for enhanced health education around outbreaks, and 3) Receptiveness to WBS being used as a tool to measure common infectious agents (i.e., influenza) but hesitancy regarding its application to conditions such as HIV and illicit drug use. PLE articulated support of robust infection control programs and receptiveness to expanding WBS if conducted in a non-stigmatizing manner. Conclusion: Perspectives from PLE can help shape the infection control programs for future outbreaks and inform the expansion of WBS implementation in carceral facilities. It will be important to consider the voices of current and former residents, as receivers of care, to promote an environment conducive to comprehensive infection control. In addition to having infection control programs consistently execute set protocols and educate all stakeholders, PLE identified collaboration between jail staff and residents, and clear communication around program expectations as priorities. Findings from this qualitative study can be shared with jail decision makers and the perceived engagement of stakeholders can be measured.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu