Quantitative blood loss measurement methods for early detection of primary postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth: A scoping review.

Autor: Wang T; Department of Nursing, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.; School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China., Li H; Department of Nursing, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.; School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China., Liu Y; Delivery Unit, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China., Min X; School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of clinical nursing [J Clin Nurs] 2024 Oct; Vol. 33 (10), pp. 3869-3885. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 19.
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17216
Abstrakt: Aim: To map the commonly used quantitative blood loss measurement methods in clinical practice and provide a solid foundation for future studies.
Design and Method: This study adhered to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. We conducted a literature search using five databases to retrieve articles published between January 2012 and September 2022. The search was repeated on 29 February 2024. Data extraction and verification were carried out by two independent researchers using a self-designed data extraction form.
Results: Ultimately, 26 studies published between 2012 and 2024 were considered eligible for inclusion. Six categories of methods were identified from the 26 articles. Among the included studies, only two involved randomized controlled trials, with the majority being observational studies. The World Health Organization (2012) version of the postpartum haemorrhage diagnostic criteria was predominantly used in most studies. Gravimetric and volumetric methods emerged as the most commonly used methods for quantifying postpartum haemorrhages. The timing of blood collection was inconsistent among the included studies. Only 12 studies mentioned measures for the management of amniotic fluid.
Conclusions: This scoping review supports the replacement of the visual estimation of blood loss with quantitative assessment methods. Supporting a specific assessment approach is not feasible due to the variability of the study. Future research should focus on establishing the best practices for specific quantitative methods to standardize the management of postpartum haemorrhage and reduce the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage-related adverse outcomes.
Relevance to Clinical Practice: Healthcare professionals need to acknowledge the low accuracy of visual estimation methods and implement quantitative methods to assess postpartum blood loss. Given the limitations inherent in each assessment method, quantification of blood loss should be combined with assessment of maternal vital signs, physiologic indicators and other factors.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: