Low back pain management in primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review on models of care.

Autor: Duarte ST; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal sp.duarte@ensp.unl.pt.; Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal., Moniz A; Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal.; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS | FCM - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal., Costa D; Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal.; Department of Physiotherapy, Escola Superior de Saúde do Alcoitão, Alcabideche, Portugal., Donato H; Documentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.; University of Coimbra Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal., Heleno B; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS | FCM - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal., Aguiar P; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health - NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal., Cruz EB; Department of Physiotherapy, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal - School of Health Care, Setúbal, Portugal.; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 May 15; Vol. 14 (5), pp. e079276. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 15.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079276
Abstrakt: Introduction: Models of care (MoCs) describe evidence-informed healthcare that should be delivered to patients. Several MoCs have been implemented for low back pain (LBP) to reduce evidence-to-practice gaps and increase the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare services.
Objective: To synthesise research evidence regarding core characteristics and key common elements of MoCs implemented in primary healthcare for the management of LBP.
Design: Scoping review.
Data Sources: Searches on MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases were conducted.
Eligibility Criteria: Eligible records included MoCs implemented for adult LBP patients in primary healthcare settings.
Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction was carried out independently by two researchers and included a summary of the studies, the identification of the MoCs and respective key elements, concerning levels of care, settings, health professionals involved, type of care delivered and core components of the interventions. Findings were investigated through a descriptive qualitative content analysis using a deductive approach.
Results: 29 studies reporting 11 MoCs were included. All MoCs were implemented in high-income countries and had clear objectives. Ten MoCs included a stratified care approach. The assessment of LBP patients typically occurred in primary healthcare while care delivery usually took place in community-based settings or outpatient clinics. Care provided by general practitioners and physiotherapists was reported in all MoCs. Education (n=10) and exercise (n=9) were the most common health interventions. However, intervention content, follow-ups and discharge criteria were not fully reported.
Conclusions: This study examines the features of MoCs for LBP, highlighting that research is in its early stages and stressing the need for better reporting to fill gaps in care delivery and implementation. This knowledge is crucial for researchers, clinicians and decision-makers in assessing the applicability and transferability of MoCs to primary healthcare settings.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: