Effect of Age and Unaided Acoustic Hearing on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Ability to Distinguish Yes/No Statements and Questions.

Autor: Buss E; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill., Richter ME; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill., Sweeney VN; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.; Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospitals, Omaha, NE., Davis AG; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill., Dillon MT; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill., Park LR; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR [J Speech Lang Hear Res] 2024 Jun 06; Vol. 67 (6), pp. 1932-1944. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 15.
DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00631
Abstrakt: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability to discriminate yes/no questions from statements in three groups of children: bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, nontraditional CI users with aidable hearing preoperatively in the ear to be implanted, and controls with normal hearing. Half of the nontraditional CI users had sufficient postoperative acoustic hearing in the implanted ear to use electric-acoustic stimulation, and half used a CI alone.
Method: Participants heard recorded sentences that were produced either as yes/no questions or as statements by three male and three female talkers. Three raters scored each participant response as either a question or a statement. Bilateral CI users ( n = 40, 4-12 years old) and normal-hearing controls ( n = 10, 4-12 years old) were tested binaurally in the free field. Nontraditional CI recipients ( n = 22, 6-17 years old) were tested with direct audio input to the study ear.
Results: For the bilateral CI users, performance was predicted by age but not by 125-Hz acoustic thresholds; just under half ( n = 17) of the participants in this group had measurable 125-Hz thresholds in their better ear. For nontraditional CI recipients, better performance was predicted by lower 125-Hz acoustic thresholds in the test ear, and there was no association with participant age. Performance approached that of the normal-hearing controls for some participants in each group.
Conclusions: Results suggest that a 125-Hz acoustic hearing supports discrimination of yes/no questions and statements in pediatric CI users. Bilateral CI users with little or no acoustic hearing at 125 Hz develop the ability to perform this task, but that ability emerges later than for children with better acoustic hearing. These results underscore the importance of preserving acoustic hearing for pediatric CI users when possible.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: