Diagnostic Efficacy Study Comparing Tzanakis Scoring System With Alvarado Scoring System in Effective Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.

Autor:	Bl YBP; General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND., Mehra B; General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND., Ghoshal S; General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND., Dubhashi SP; General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Apr 11; Vol. 16 (4), pp. e58018. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 11 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.58018
Abstrakt:	Objective Among the common causes of abdominal emergencies, acute appendicitis ranks at the top, particularly in the young population. While negative appendectomy is not uncommon, the risk of appendicular perforation is substantial if the diagnosis is missed or delayed. This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of the Tzanakis scoring system for acute appendicitis, comparing it with the Alvarado scoring system, considering the histopathological finding as the gold standard. Materials and methods This prospective observational study, conducted in the General Surgery department in a tertiary care hospital in India, included clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis cases posted for open or laparoscopic appendicectomy. Results The mean age for the 60 participants included in the study was 30.97±13.44, and the median was 24.5 yrs. The sensitivity of ultrasonography (USG) in diagnosing histopathological positive acute appendicitis was 89%, and the specificity was 50%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the Tzanakis score were 87%, 50%, 96%, and 22%, respectively, and those of the Alvarado score were 54%, 75%, 96%, and 10%, respectively. Conclusion The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the Alvarado and Tzanakis scores showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was greater for the Tzanakis scoring system (0.670) than for the Alvarado scoring system (0.598). Differences between the AUCs were not statistically significant. Although the Tzanakis scoring system is more sensitive than the Alvarado scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis, studies with larger samples are needed to show the superiority of this scoring system over the Alvarado scoring system. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2024, BL et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu