Collared Cementless Femoral Components Reduce the Revision Rates in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study.

Autor: Rele S; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia., O'Bryan E; Orthopaedic Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Holder C; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia., Lewis PL; Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia., Di Bella C; Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Eastern Hill Campus, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; Department of Orthopaedics, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Bone and Joint Specialists, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2024 Sep; Vol. 39 (9S2), pp. S340-S346.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 10.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.009
Abstrakt: Background: An increased risk of periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening is reported when the direct anterior approach (DAA) is used for total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially with cementless implants. We assessed the rate of revision comparing collared and collarless femoral stems when using the DAA for THA.
Methods: We used data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry for primary THA for osteoarthritis inserted with the DAA between January 2015 and December 2022. There were 48,567 THAs that used the DAA (26,690 collarless cementless, 10,161 collared cementless, and 11,716 cemented). Cumulative percent revision was calculated for all-cause revision, revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures, and aseptic femoral stem loosening. Cox proportional hazard ratios [HRs] were used to compare the revision of collared and collarless cementless stems. We also compared collared cementless stems and cemented stems.
Results: A higher rate of all-cause revision within 3 months of surgery was observed with collarless compared to collared cementless implants (HR: 1.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56 to 2.54]; P < .001). Similarly, collarless cementless implants were associated with a greater rate of revision for fracture in the first 6 months (HR: 2.90 [95% CI, 1.89 to 4.45]; P < .001) and after 6 months (HR 10.04 [95% CI 1.38 to 73.21]; P = .02), as well as an increased rate of revision for aseptic loosening after 2 years (HR: 5.76 [95% CI, 1.81 to 18.28], P = .003). Collared cementless and cemented stems performed similarly.
Conclusion: Collared stems were associated with a reduced rate of all-cause revision for cementless THA performed via the DAA. The reduction in risk may be due to protection from periprosthetic femoral fracture and aseptic loosening.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: