Hyperbaric bupivacaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia combined with total intravenous anesthesia during oncological colon surgery in a 23-hour stay enhanced recovery protocol: A non-randomized study.

Autor:	Sier MAT; Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.; School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands., Tweed TTT; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands., Nel J; Department of Anesthesiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands., Daher I; Department of Gastroenterology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands., Bakens MJAM; Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands., van Bastelaar J; Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands., Stoot JHMB; Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Medicine [Medicine (Baltimore)] 2024 May 10; Vol. 103 (19), pp. e37957.
DOI:	10.1097/MD.0000000000037957
Abstrakt:	After the success of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, perioperative care has been further optimized in accelerated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), where optimal pain management is crucial. Spinal anesthesia was introduced as adjunct to general anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain and facilitate mobility. This study aimed to determine which spinal anesthetic agent provides best pain relief in accelerated ERP for colon carcinoma. This single center study was a secondary analysis conducted among patients included in the aCcelerated 23-Hour erAS care for colon surgEry study who underwent elective laparoscopic colon surgery. The first 30 patients included received total intravenous anesthesia combined with spinal anesthesia with prilocaine, the 30 patients subsequently included received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Primary endpoint of this study was the total amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered during hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were amounts of MMEs administered in the recovery room and surgical ward, pain score using the numeric rating scale, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Compared to prilocaine, the total amount of MMEs administered was significantly lower in the bupivacaine group (n = 60, 16.3 vs 6.3, P = .049). Also, the amount of MMEs administered and median pain scores were significantly lower after intrathecal bupivacaine in the recovery room (MMEs 11.0 vs 0.0, P = .012 and numeric rating scale 2.0 vs 1.5, P = .004). On the surgical ward, median MMEs administered, and pain scores were comparable. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine was associated with less opioid use and better pain reduction immediately after surgery compared to prilocaine within an accelerated ERP for elective, oncological colon surgery. Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose. (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu