Elucidating the Benefit of Perforated vs Non-Perforated Membranes in Guided Bone Regeneration: An in Vivo Histologic Evaluation and Histomorphometric Analysis.
| Autor: | Urban IA, Mirsky N, Serroni M, Tovar N, Vivekanand Nayak V, Witek L, Marin C, Saleh MHA, Ravida A, Baczko I, Parkanyi L, Nagy K, Coelho PG |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry [Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent] 2024 May 03; Vol. 0 (0), pp. 1-27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 03. |
| DOI: | 10.11607/prd.7110 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Non-perforated Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes are effectively utilized in guided bone regeneration (GBR) but may hinder cell migration due to limited interaction with the periosteum. This study compared bone regeneration using occlusive or perforated membranes combined with acellular collagen sponge (ACS) and recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in a canine mandibular model. Material and Methods: Male beagle dogs (n=3) received two mandibular defects each to compare ACS/rhBMP-2 with experimental (perforated group) and control (non-perforated group) membranes (n=3 defects/group). Tissue healing was assessed histomorphologically, histomorphometrically and through volumetric reconstruction using microcomputed tomography. Results: The perforated group showed increased bone formation and reduced soft tissue formation compared to the non-perforated group. For the primary outcome, histomorphometric analysis revealed significantly greater total regenerated bone in the perforated group (67.08 ± 6.86%) relative to the nonperforated group (25.18 ± 22.44%) (p = 0.036). Perforated membranes had less soft tissue infiltration (32.91 ± 6.86%) compared to non-perforated membranes (74.82 ± 22.44%) (p = 0.036). Conclusion: The increased permeability of membranes in the perforated group potentially enabled periosteal precursor cells greater accessibility to rhBMP-2. The availability may have accelerated their differentiation into mature bone-forming cells, contributing to the stimulation of new bone production, relative to the non-perforated group. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|