Comparative analysis of simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost radiotherapy in node-positive cervical cancer: dosimetric and radiobiological considerations.
Autor: | Mishra R; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Singh S; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Patel G; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Mandal A; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Mishra H; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India. hmsra1801@gmail.com., Pandey A; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India., Bahadur B; Centre of Biostatistics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Singh PK; Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Sachan S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India., Tewari M; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P, 221005, India. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Radiation and environmental biophysics [Radiat Environ Biophys] 2024 May; Vol. 63 (2), pp. 297-306. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 09. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00411-024-01069-0 |
Abstrakt: | For locally advanced cervical cancer, the standard therapeutic approach involves concomitant chemoradiation therapy, supplemented by a brachytherapy boost. Moreover, an external beam radiotherapy (RT) boost should be considered for treating gross lymph node (LN) volumes. Two boost approaches exist with Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): Sequential (SEQ) and Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB). This study undertakes a comprehensive dosimetric and radiobiological comparison between these two boost strategies. The study encompassed ten patients who underwent RT for cervical cancer with node-positive disease. Two sets of treatment plans were generated for each patient: SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT. Dosimetric as well as radiobiological parameters including tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were compared. Both techniques were analyzed for two different levels of LN involvement - only pelvic LNs and pelvic with para-aortic LNs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 25.0. SIB-VMAT exhibited superior target coverage, yielding improved doses to the planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumour volume (GTV). Notably, SIB-VMAT plans displayed markedly superior dose conformity. While SEQ-VMAT displayed favorable organ sparing for femoral heads, SIB-VMAT appeared as the more efficient approach for mitigating bladder and bowel doses. TCP was significantly higher with SIB-VMAT, suggesting a higher likelihood of successful tumour control. Conversely, no statistically significant difference in NTCP was observed between the two techniques. This study's findings underscore the advantages of SIB-VMAT over SEQ-VMAT in terms of improved target coverage, dose conformity, and tumour control probability. In particular, SIB-VMAT demonstrated potential benefits for cases involving para-aortic nodes. It is concluded that SIB-VMAT should be the preferred approach in all cases of locally advanced cervical cancer. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |