Status of vector protection measures and awareness regarding vector borne diseases in families residing in a "Nirmal Gram Puraskar" village in India.

Autor:	Rohit A; Department of Community Medicine, JJM Medical College, Davanagere, Karnataka, India., Mangasuli V; Department of Community Medicine, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India., Amrutha AM; Department of Community Medicine, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India., Sidenur B; Department of Community Medicine, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India., Vijeth SB; Department of General Medicine, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of vector borne diseases [J Vector Borne Dis] 2024 Jul 01; Vol. 61 (3), pp. 472-476. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 21.
DOI:	10.4103/JVBD.JVBD_27_24
Abstrakt:	Background Objectives: Mosquito-bome diseases are increasing problems in various parts of the world, causing high mortality and morbidity for humans. This study was done to assess the vector protection measures taken by rural below poverty line (BPL) families, and to assess the awareness about vector-borne diseases along with Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) in rural BPL families. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural area which won "Nirmal Gram Puraskar" Award i.e., "clean village" among 96 below BPL families for a period of three months. These families (every 5 th ) were selected by systematic random sampling until we reached a sample size. Basic socio-demographic details, status of vector protection measures, solid waste management, vector-borne diseases and total sanitation campaign details were collected from the study participants. Pretested, semi-structured questionnaire was applied to the head of the families which included sanitation status at home by house-to-house visit. Data collected was analysed using SPSS version 20 and presented as frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Results: Among 96 families studied (454 adults and children), 84 (87.5%) were males and 12 (12.5%) were females. Among these, 291 (64.1%) were using one or the other mosquito protection measures, 52 (54.2%) were using bednets and 23 (23.9%) used coils. 12 families (12.5%) were not using any mosquito protection measures. In our study, 66 (68.8%) families had individual household latrine (IHHL) and 50 (52.1%) had open drainage. Even though 314 participants had an access to individual household latrine, 20 (6.36%) had practice of open air defecation compared to 127 (90.7%) who practiced open air defecation without an access to individual household latrine. When asked about the awareness regarding vector-borne diseases, 56 (58.3%) were aware about chikungunya, 47 (48.9%) about dengue, 46 (47.9%) about malaria, 14 (14.6%) and only 5 (5.2%) families were aware about Japanese encephalitis. In this study, 37 (38.5%) were aware about the total sanitation campaign and 40 (41.6%) about the government support for sanitation. Interpretation Conclusion: While there is a general awareness of vector-borne diseases, the implementation of vector protection measures is not uniform across the village. There is a need for targeted interventions to improve the effectiveness of vector protection measures and increase awareness among the community. (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Vector Borne Diseases.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu