Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection for large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
| Autor: | Fakhoury B; St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA., Alabdul Razzak I; St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA., Morin R; Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA., Krishnan S; St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA., Mahmood S; St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology [Scand J Gastroenterol] 2024 Jul; Vol. 59 (7), pp. 798-807. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 07. |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00365521.2024.2349641 |
| Abstrakt: | Background and Aims: Combined endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with endoscopic Full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging technique that has been developed to target colorectal polyps larger than 2 cm. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this technique for the resection of large colorectal lesions. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases from inception through August 2023, to identify studies that reported on hybrid FTR. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the overall pooled technical success, macroscopic complete resection, free vertical margins resection rate, adverse events, and recurrence on follow up. Results: A total of 8 Study arms with 244 patients (30% women) were included in the analysis. The pooled technical success rate was 97% (95% CI 88%-100%, I 2 = 79.93%). The pooled rate of macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 95% (95% CI 90%-99%, I 2 = 49.98) with a free vertical margins resection rate 88% (95% CI, 78%-96%, I 2 = 63.32). The overall adverse events rate was 2% (95% CI 0%-5%, I 2 = 11.64) and recurrence rate of 6% (95% CI 2%-12%, I 2 =20.32). Conclusion: Combined EMR with EFTR is effective and safe for resecting large, and complex colorectal adenomas, offering a good alternative for high surgical risk patients. Regional heterogeneity was observed, indicating that outcomes may be impacted by differences in operator expertise and industry training certification across regions. Comparative studies that directly compare combined EMR with EFTR against alternative methods such as ESD and surgical resection are needed. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|