The effectiveness of cervical mucus electrical impedance compared to basal body temperature to determine fertility window.

Autor: Tabbaa S; Lady Technologies, San Francisco, CA, USA. suzanne.tabbaa@ucsf.edu.; Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF School of Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave, #346, 94110, San Francisco, CA, USA. suzanne.tabbaa@ucsf.edu., Hambright S; Lady Technologies, San Francisco, CA, USA., Sikes KJ; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA., Levy G; Fertility Cloud, Palo Alto, CA, USA., Rydfors J; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.; Freyja Medical Clinic, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Contraception and reproductive medicine [Contracept Reprod Med] 2024 May 06; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 20. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 06.
DOI: 10.1186/s40834-024-00276-w
Abstrakt: Background: Serial serum hormone measurements and transvaginal ultrasound are reliable measures to predict ovulation. These measures are inconvenient and expensive therefore, basal body temperature charting (BBT) and urine ovulation predictor kits (OPK) for luteinizing hormone are often used to determine the 6-day fertile window. However, BBT does not clearly change until 1-2 days after ovulation. Additionally, while OPK can indicate positivity prior to ovulation, false readings are common. A novel alternative approach involves measuring electrolyte trends in cervical mucus using electrical impedance spectroscopy. Cervical mucus electrolyte measurements are associated with hormone level changes during the menstrual cycle. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cervical mucus electrical impedance and basal body temperature. We sought to determine if cervical mucus electrolyte measurements provided improved detection of the ovulation day and therefore, improve fertility timing for women.
Methods: 14 healthy women between 18 and 44 years of age with normal menstrual cycles were enrolled in the Observational Study. Participants measured BBT and cervical mucus electrical impedance daily for 3 menstrual cycles using Kegg (Lady Technologies Inc. San Francisco, California, USA). Ovulation date for each cycle was confirmed by measuring hormone levels in urine and serum, and by vaginal ultrasound.
Results: Electrical impedance was significantly different between the follicular phase versus ovulatory date (p = 0.007) and between the luteal phase versus the ovulatory date (p = 0.007). A significant difference in the rate of change of cervical impedance measurements in the pre-ovulatory follicular phase was found compared to BBT (p = 0.0225). The sensitivity (+ 7.14%), specificity (+ 20.35%), and accuracy (+ 17.59) to determine the 1-day fertility window was significantly higher using cervical mucus impedance compared to BBT.
Conclusions: BBT is considered unreliable for evaluating ovulatory function. Cervical mucus electrical impedance offers a novel measure of electrolyte changes associated with hormone levels. We report that pre-ovulatory electrical impedance patterns demonstrated higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for determining the fertility window when compared to BBT. These findings suggest that changes in electrical impedance may provide an accurate method for predicting ovulation and for measuring ovulatory function.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: