Advancing progress on tobacco control in low-income and middle-income countries through economic analysis.

Autor: Small R; HIV, Health and Development Group, United Nations Development Programme, New York, New York, USA roy.small@undp.org., Nugent R; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA., Webb D; United Nations Development Programme, Tbilsi, Georgia., Hutchinson B; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA., Spencer G; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA., Ngongo C; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA., Chestnov R; Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland., Tarlton D; United Nations Development Programme, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Tobacco control [Tob Control] 2024 May 02; Vol. 33 (Suppl 1), pp. s3-s9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 02.
DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-058335
Abstrakt: Background: More than 80% of the world's 1.3 billion tobacco users live in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where progress to address tobacco and its harms has been slow. The perception that tobacco control detracts from economic priorities has impeded progress. The Secretariat of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) is leading the FCTC 2030 project, which includes technical assistance to LMICs to analyse the economic costs of tobacco use and the benefits of tobacco control.
Methods: The Secretariat of the WHO FCTC, United Nations Development Programme and WHO supported 21 LMICs between 2017 and 2022 to complete national investment cases to guide country implementation of the WHO FCTC, with analytical support provided by RTI International. These country-level cases combine customised estimates of tobacco's economic impact with qualitative analysis of socio-political factors influencing tobacco control. This paper overviews the approach, observed tobacco control advancements and learnings from 21 countries: Armenia, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Eswatini, Georgia, Ghana, Jordan, Laos, Madagascar, Myanmar, Nepal, Samoa, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Tunisia and Zambia.
Results: Tobacco control advancements in line with investment case findings and recommendations have been observed in 17 of the 21 countries, and many have improved collaboration and policy coherence between health and economic stakeholders.
Conclusions: Tobacco control must be seen as more than a health concern. Tobacco control leads to economic benefits and contributes to sustainable development. National investment cases can support country ownership and leadership to advance tobacco control.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze: MEDLINE