Psychometric properties of two implementation measures: Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaire (NoMAD) and organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC).

Autor:	Batterham P; Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia., Allenhof C; German Foundation for Research and Education on Depression, Leipzig, Germany., Cerga Pashoja A; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; St. Marys University Twickenham, UK., Etzelmueller A; HelloBetter, GET.ON Institut für Online Gesundheitstrainings GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.; Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Professorship Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, München, Germany., Fanaj N; Alma Mater Europaea Campus College Rezonanca, Pristina, Kosovo., Finch T; Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK., Freund J; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.; Professorship Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany., Hanssen D; Interdisciplinary Centre Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands., Mathiasen K; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.; Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark., Piera Jiminez J; Government of Catalonia Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain.; Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System (DS3), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.; Faculty of Informatics, Telecommunications and Multimedia, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain., Qirjako G; Department of Public Health, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirane, Albania.; Community Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Tirane, Albania., Rapley T; Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK., Sacco Y; Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Presidio Ausiliatrice S. Maria ai Colli, Torino, Italy., Samalin L; Department of Psychiatry, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal (UMR 6602), Clermont-Ferrand, France., Schuurmans J; Taytelbaum Psychologen, Amsterdam., van Genugten C; Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Mental Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands., Vis C; Mental Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Forhelse Research Centre for Digital Mental Health Services Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Implementation research and practice [Implement Res Pract] 2024 Apr 28; Vol. 5, pp. 26334895241245448. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 28 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.1177/26334895241245448
Abstrakt:	Background: Effective interventions need to be implemented successfully to achieve impact. Two theory-based measures exist for measuring the effectiveness of implementation strategies and monitor implementation progress. The Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaire (NoMAD) explores the four core concepts (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) of the Normalization Process Theory. The Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) is based on the theory of Organizational Readiness for Change, measuring organization members' psychological and behavioral preparedness for implementing a change. We examined the measurement properties of the NoMAD and ORIC in a multi-national implementation effectiveness study. Method: Twelve mental health organizations in nine countries implemented Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for common mental disorders. Staff involved in iCBT service delivery ( n  = 318) participated in the study. Both measures were translated into eight languages using a standardized forward-backward translation procedure. Correlations between measures and subscales were estimated to examine convergent validity. The theoretical factor structures of the scales were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Test-retest reliability was based on the correlation between scores at two time points 3 months apart. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Floor and ceiling effects were quantified using the proportion of zero and maximum scores. Results: NoMAD and ORIC measure related but distinct latent constructs. The CFA showed that the use of a total score for each measure is appropriate. The theoretical subscales of the NoMAD had adequate internal consistency. The total scale had high internal consistency. The total ORIC scale and subscales demonstrated high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was suboptimal for both measures and floor and ceiling effects were absent. Conclusions: This study confirmed the psychometric properties of the NoMAD and ORIC in multi-national mental health care settings. While measuring on different but related aspects of implementation processes, the NoMAD and ORIC prove to be valid and reliable across different language settings. Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Ludovic Samalin has received honoraria and served as consultant for Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Rovi, Sanofi-Aventis with no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article. Other coauthors declare no competing interests. (© The Author(s) 2024.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu