Comparing energy system optimization models and integrated assessment models: Relevance for energy policy advice.
Autor: | Henke H; Division of Energy Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden., Dekker M; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht Universiteit, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, Den Haag, The Netherlands., Lombardi F; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands., Pietzcker R; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany., Fragkos P; E3-Modelling S.A., Panormou 70-72, Athens, Greece., Zakeri B; Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE) Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria., Rodrigues R; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany., Sitarz J; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.; Global Energy Systems Analysis, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Emmerling J; RFF-CMCC European Institute for the Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Milan, Italy., Fattahi A; TNO Energy Transition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Dalla Longa F; TNO Energy Transition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Tatarewicz I; The Institute of Environmental Protection - National Research Institute (IOS-PIB) / National Centre for Emissions Management (KOBiZE), Warsaw, Poland., Fotiou T; E3-Modelling S.A., Panormou 70-72, Athens, Greece., Lewarski M; The Institute of Environmental Protection - National Research Institute (IOS-PIB) / National Centre for Emissions Management (KOBiZE), Warsaw, Poland., Huppmann D; Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE) Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria., Kavvadias K; E3-Modelling S.A., Panormou 70-72, Athens, Greece., van der Zwaan B; TNO Energy Transition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Usher W; Division of Energy Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Open research Europe [Open Res Eur] 2024 Mar 21; Vol. 3, pp. 69. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 21 (Print Publication: 2023). |
DOI: | 10.12688/openreseurope.15590.2 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The transition to a climate neutral society such as that envisaged in the European Union Green Deal requires careful and comprehensive planning. Integrated assessment models (IAMs) and energy system optimisation models (ESOMs) are both commonly used for policy advice and in the process of policy design. In Europe, a vast landscape of these models has emerged and both kinds of models have been part of numerous model comparison and model linking exercises. However, IAMs and ESOMs have rarely been compared or linked with one another. Methods: This study conducts an explorative comparison and identifies possible flows of information between 11 of the integrated assessment and energy system models in the European Climate and Energy Modelling Forum. The study identifies and compares regional aggregations and commonly reported variables. We define harmonised regions and a subset of shared result variables that enable the comparison of scenario results across the models. Results: The results highlight how power generation and demand development are related and driven by regional and sectoral drivers. They also show that demand developments like for hydrogen can be linked with power generation potentials such as onshore wind power. Lastly, the results show that the role of nuclear power is related to the availability of wind resources. Conclusions: This comparison and analysis of modelling results across model type boundaries provides modellers and policymakers with a better understanding of how to interpret both IAM and ESOM results. It also highlights the need for community standards for region definitions and information about reported variables to facilitate future comparisons of this kind. The comparison shows that regional aggregations might conceal differences within regions that are potentially of interest for national policy makers thereby indicating a need for national-level analysis. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. (Copyright: © 2024 Henke H et al.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |