Ethical Dilemmas of Using Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.
| Autor: | Astărăstoae V; Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T Popa University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania; and., Rogozea LM; Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania., Leaşu F; Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania., Ioan BG; Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T Popa University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania; and. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | American journal of therapeutics [Am J Ther] 2024 Jul-Aug 01; Vol. 31 (4), pp. e388-e397. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 25. |
| DOI: | 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001693 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is considered the fourth industrial revolution that will change the evolution of humanity technically and relationally. Although the term has been around since 1956, it has only recently become apparent that AI can revolutionize technologies and has many applications in the medical field. Areas of Uncertainty: The ethical dilemmas posed by the use of AI in medicine revolve around issues related to informed consent, respect for confidentiality, protection of personal data, and last but not least the accuracy of the information it uses. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2022) using combinations of keywords, including: AI, future in medicine, and machine learning plus ethical dilemma. Ethics and Therapeutic Advances: The ethical analysis of the issues raised by AI used in medicine must mainly address nonmaleficence and beneficence, both in correlation with patient safety risks, ability versus inability to detect correct information from inadequate or even incorrect information. The development of AI tools that can support medical practice can increase people's access to medical information, to obtain a second opinion, for example, but it is also a source of concern among health care professionals and especially bioethicists about how confidentiality is maintained and how to maintain cybersecurity. Another major risk may be related to the dehumanization of the medical act, given that, at least for now, empathy and compassion are accessible only to human beings. Conclusions: AI has not yet managed to overcome certain limits, lacking moral subjectivity, empathy, the level of critical thinking is still insufficient, but no matter who will practice preventive or curative medicine in the next period, they will not be able to ignore AI, which under human control can be an important tool in medical practice. Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|