Lower Risk of Revision With 32- and 36-Millimeter Femoral Heads Compared With 28-mm Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparative Single-Center Study (10,104 Hips).

Autor: Matar HE; Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom., van Duren BH; Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom., Bloch BV; Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom., Berber R; Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom., James PJ; Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom., Manktelow ARJ; Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2024 Apr; Vol. 39 (4), pp. 991-996. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 30.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.042
Abstrakt: Background: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of different head sizes (28-, 32-, and 36- millimeter) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at mean 6 years follow-up (range, 1 to 17.5 years).
Methods: This was a retrospective consecutive study of primary THA at our institution (2003 to 2019). Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for dislocation, and all-cause revision excluding dislocation. Continuous descriptive statistics used means, median values, ranges, and 95% confidence intervals, where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to revision. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to compare revision rates between the femoral head size groups. Adjustments were made for age at surgery, sex, primary diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, articulation type, and fixation methods. There were 10,104 primary THAs included; median age was 69 years (range, 13 to 101) with 61.5% women. A posterior approach was performed in 71.6%. There were 3,295 hips with 28-mm heads (32.6%), 4,858 (48.1%) with 32-mm heads, and 1,951 (19.3%) with 36-mm heads.
Results: Overall rate of revision was 1.7% with the lowest rate recorded for the 36-mm group (2.7 versus 1.3 versus 1.1%). Cox regression analyses showed a decreased risk of all-cause revision for 32 and 36-mm head sizes as compared to 28-mm; this was statistically significant for the 32-mm group (P = .01). Risk of revision for dislocation was significantly reduced in both 32-mm (P = .03) and 36-mm (P = .03) head sizes. Analysis of all cause revision excluding dislocation showed no significant differences between head sizes.
Conclusions: We found a significantly reduced risk of revision for all causes, but particularly revision for dislocation with larger head sizes. Concerns regarding increased risk of early revision for aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear, or taper corrosion with larger heads appear to be unfounded in this cohort of 10,104 patients with up to 17 years follow-up.
(Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: