Comparison of Traditional and Advanced Resistance Training Paradigms on Muscle Hypertrophy in Trained Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Autor: Fonseca PAB; Exercise Science, Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., Ide BN; Exercise Science, Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil., Oranchuk DJ; Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.; Acumen Health, Calgary, AB, Canada., Marocolo M; Department of Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil., Simim MAM; Physical Education and Adapted Sports Research Group, Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil., Roberts MD; School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA., Mota GR; Exercise Science, Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Translational sports medicine [Transl Sports Med] 2023 Jul 18; Vol. 2023, pp. 9507977. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 18 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI: 10.1155/2023/9507977
Abstrakt: Trained individuals may require variations in training stimuli and advanced resistance training paradigms (ADV) to increase skeletal muscle hypertrophy. However, no meta-analysis has examined how ADV versus traditional (TRAD) approaches may differentially affect hypertrophic outcomes in trained populations. The aim of this review was to determine whether the skeletal muscle hypertrophy responses induced by TRAD differed from ADV in resistance-trained individuals. Furthermore, we sought to examine potential effects of dietary factors, participants' training status, and training loads. We searched for peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials (published in English) conducted in healthy resistance-trained adults performing a period of TRAD and ADV with pre-to-post measurement(s) of muscle hypertrophy in PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE databases up to October 2022. A formal meta-analysis was conducted in Revman5, and risk of bias was assessed by ROB2. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Results indicated no difference between ADV and TRAD for muscle thickness (SMD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.20 0.29, p  = 0.70), lean mass (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.26 0.23, p  = 0.92), muscle cross-sectional area (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.36 0.22, p  = 0.64), or all measurements analyzed together (SMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.15 0.14, p  = 0.95). No heterogeneity or inconsistencies were observed; however, unclear risk of bias was present in most of the studies. Short-term ADV does not induce superior skeletal muscle hypertrophy responses when compared with TRAD in trained individuals. This review was not previously registered.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Pedro A. B. Fonseca et al.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: