Binaural hearing in monaural conductive or mixed hearing loss fitted with unilateral Bonebridge.

Autor:	Canale A; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Urbanelli A; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Albera R; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Gragnano M; Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Bordino V; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Riva G; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Sportoletti Baduel E; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy., Albera A; ENT Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale [Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital] 2024 Apr; Vol. 44 (2), pp. 113-119.
DOI:	10.14639/0392-100X-N2752
Abstrakt:	Objective: To determine the benefits of binaural hearing rehabilitation in patients with monaural conductive or mixed hearing loss treated with a unilateral bone conduction implant (BCI). Methods: This monocentric study includes 7 patients with monaural conductive or mixed hearing loss who underwent surgical implantation of a unilateral BCI (Bonebridge, Med-El). An ITA Matrix test was performed by each patient included in the study - without and with the BCI and in three different settings - to determine the summation effect, squelch effect and head shadow effect. Subjective hearing benefits were assessed using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. Results: The difference in signal to noise ratio of patients without and with BCI was 0.79 dB in the summation setting (p < 0.05), 4.62 dB in the head shadow setting (p < 0.05) and 1.53 dB (p = 0.063) in the squelch setting. The APHAB questionnaire revealed a subjective discomfort in the presence of unexpected sounds in patients using a unilateral BCI (aversiveness score) compared to the same environmental situations without BCI, with a mean discomfort score of 69.00% (SD ± 21.24%) with monaural BCI versus 25.67% (SD ± 16.70%) without BCI (difference: -43.33%, p < 0.05). In terms of global score, patients wearing a unilateral Bonebridge implant did not show any significant differences compared to those without hearing aid (difference: -4.00%, p = 0.310). Conclusions: Our study shows that the use of a unilateral BCI in patients affected by monaural conductive or mixed hearing loss can improve speech perception under noise conditions due to the summation effect and to the decrease of the head shadow effect. However, since monaural BCIs might lead to discomfort under noise conditions in some subjects, a pre-operative assessment of the possible individual benefit of a monaural BCI should be carried out in patients affected by unilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss in order to investigate the possible additional effect of the fitting of hearing aids. (Copyright © 2024 Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu