Preoperative risk calculator for the probability of completing nephron sparing for kidney cancer.
Autor: | Cei F; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Larcher A; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: larcher.alessandro@hsr.it., Rosiello G; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Basile G; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Musso G; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Re C; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Fallara G; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Belladelli F; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Brembilla G; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Guazzarotti G; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., De Cobelli F; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Marandino L; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Necchi A; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Briganti A; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Salonia A; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Bertini R; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Montorsi F; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Capitanio U; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Urologic oncology [Urol Oncol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 42 (8), pp. 247.e21-247.e27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 21. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.029 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: In absence of predictive models, preoperative estimation of the probability of completing partial (PN) relative to radical nephrectomy (RN) is invariably inaccurate and subjective. We aimed to develop an evidence-based model to assess objectively the probability of PN completion based on patients' characteristics, tumor's complexity, urologist expertise and surgical approach. Design, Setting and Participants: 675 patients treated with PN or RN for cT Outcomes Measurements and Statistical Analyses: The outcome of the study was PN completion. We used a multivariable logistic regression (MVA) model to investigate predictors of PN completion. We used SPARE score to assess tumor complexity. We used a bootstrap validation to compute the model's predictive accuracy. We investigated the relationship between the outcomes and specific predictors of interest such as tumor's complexity, approach and experience. Results: Of 675 patients, 360 (53%) were treated with PN vs. 315 (47%) with RN. Smaller tumors [Odds ratio (OR): 0.52, 95%CI 0.44-0.61; P < 0.001], lower SPARE score (OR: 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02), more experienced surgeons (OR: 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.02; P < 0.01), robotic (OR: 10; P < 0.001) and open (OR: 36; P < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic approach resulted associated with higher probability of PN completion. Predictive accuracy of the model was 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.95). Conclusions: The probability of PN completion can be preoperatively assessed, with optimal accuracy relaying on routinely available clinical information. The proposed model might be useful in preoperative decision-making, patient consensus, or during preoperative counselling. Patient Summary: In patients with a renal mass the probability of completing a partial nephrectomy varies considerably and without a predictive model is invariably inaccurate and subjective. In this study we build-up a risk calculator based on easily available preoperative variables that can predict with optimal accuracy the probability of not removing the entire kidney. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest A. Necchi reports honoraria from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Foundation Medicine; has served as a consultant or advisor for Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Rainier Therapeutics, Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Astellas Pharma and Rainier Therapeutics; has received research funding from Incyte, Merck Sharp & Dohme (institution), and AstraZeneca (institution); and has received travel funding from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Astra Zeneca, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |