Assessing the Variability in Interpretation of the Catholic Directives Pertaining to Reproductive Health Services: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Two Hospitals on the American East Coast.

Autor: Blomgren MN; Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Road North Haven, North Haven, CT, 06473, USA. Michelle.blomgren@gmail.com.; Department of OB/GYN, Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. Michelle.blomgren@gmail.com., McCave E; Department of Social Work, Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Road North Haven, North Haven, CT, 06473, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of religion and health [J Relig Health] 2024 Aug; Vol. 63 (4), pp. 3190-3205. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 21.
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-024-02043-2
Abstrakt: The ethics in Catholic hospitals are guided by the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, which provide direction on many topics, including family planning. Previous research has demonstrated there is variability in the availability of prohibited family planning services at Catholic hospitals. This study aims to research a potential source of variability in interpretation and application of the directives through interviewing ethics committee members. Participants were recruited from two different hospitals on the east coast with a total sample size of eight. Ethics committee members were asked questions regarding their personal approach to ethics, their hospital's approach to ethics, and the permissibility of specific family planning methods at their hospital. Most ethics committee members stated that the Catholic faith and/or directives were important in their hospitals' approach to ethics. Most participants stated that they had instances in which their personal approach to ethics conflicted with their hospital's approach, citing women's health and end-of-life care as common causes of conflict. All but one ethics committee member stated that hormonal contraception was forbidden under the directives; however, many members stated that this was either a gray area or permissible under certain circumstances. Reproductive health issues rarely came before the ethics committee at either site with one participant referring to them as "black and white issues." This research suggests that ethics committee members did not see the directives governing family planning services to be ambiguous. However, given the low frequency in which these issues come to the attention of the ethics committee, it is difficult to determine whether the opinions expressed by our participants contribute to the variability between Catholic hospitals when it comes to reproductive healthcare provision. An interesting topic for future research would be interviewing executives at Catholic hospitals to determine where this variability arises.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: