Exploring practices, challenges, and priorities for human health and ecological risk assessments in Indigenous communities in Canada.

Autor: Chong K; Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; Centre for Indigenous Peoples Nutrition and Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada., Hickey GM; Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada., Chan HM; Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Basu N; Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.; Centre for Indigenous Peoples Nutrition and Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Integrated environmental assessment and management [Integr Environ Assess Manag] 2024 Sep; Vol. 20 (5), pp. 1677-1692. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 19.
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4927
Abstrakt: Indigenous peoples in Canada are disproportionately exposed to environmental contaminants and may face elevated health risks related to their unique cultural, spiritual, and economic relationships with the land, including the use of traditional food systems. However, to date, institutionalized approaches to assess risks to human and ecological health from contaminants have not been well developed or implemented with Indigenous community contexts in mind. There is regulatory interest in developing new approach methods for risk assessment, and thus an opportunity to increase their relevance to Indigenous communities in which they will be ultimately applied. Therefore, we conducted an anonymous mixed-methods survey of those involved with risk assessment in Indigenous communities in Canada to: (1) understand risk assessment practice in Indigenous communities, (2) explore challenges with conventional assessment methods and compare these across sectors, and (3) gather perspectives on the development of new approaches. In all, 38 completed survey responses were received (14% response rate). Respondents were from Indigenous community environment and health offices (21% of respondents), Indigenous governments (8%), federal and provincial governments (21%), and academia (45%). Risk communication was seen as the most challenging part of risk assessment (71% responded "difficult"), and nearly all respondents agreed that time (86%), cost (76%), and resource availability (86%) were "moderate" to "serious" problems. Few respondents (16%) had heard of "new approach methods" for risk assessment, and 76% of respondents (and 100% of community-based respondents) agreed on the need to develop improved risk assessment approaches. To modernize risk assessment, respondents recommended advancing cumulative risk assessment methods, improving risk communication, and promoting Indigenous leadership and Traditional Knowledge in assessment activities. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1677-1692. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
(© 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: