Assessing the performance of the integrated disease surveillance and response systems: a systematic review of global evidence.

Autor: Sasie SD; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: sileyeshi21@gmail.com., Ayano G; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Australia. Electronic address: babiget2015@gmail.com., Mamo F; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. Electronic address: fantuma3@gmail.com., Azage M; Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Electronic address: mulukenag@yahoo.com., Spigt M; Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; General Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Electronic address: m.spigt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Public health [Public Health] 2024 Jun; Vol. 231, pp. 71-79. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 17.
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.013
Abstrakt: Objectives: Public health surveillance systems are critical for detecting and responding to health threats. This review aims to analyze international literature on the performance of these systems in terms of core, support, and attributes of surveillance system.
Study Design: Systematic review.
Methods: Following the preregistered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022366051), a systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, CINHAL, CABI, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles evaluating Public Health Surveillance System performance from inception to July 21, 2023. Various study designs were included, and quality assessment was performed. Thematic analysis categorized findings into key surveillance system functions.
Results: Nine studies from different countries assessed core and supportive functions, as well as surveillance attributes. Performance varied among countries, with some excelling overall and others showing poor performance in specific areas. Many countries' surveillance systems had inadequate performance in key measures in terms of the core and supportive functions, as well as the attributes of the surveillance system.
Conclusion: This review shows significant variations in the performance of public health surveillance systems across countries. Further research is needed to understand underperformance reasons and inform global policymaking for strengthening surveillance systems.
(Copyright © 2024 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: