Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three cases and review of the literature with focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management.

Autor: Fabbrocini L; Department of Neurosurgery, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Alfried Krupp Str. 21, 45131, Essen, Germany. ludovica.fabbrocini@gmail.com., Zin F; Institute of Neuropathology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany., Keyvani K; Institute of Neuropathology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany., Ebner FH; Department of Neurosurgery, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Alfried Krupp Str. 21, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Neurosurgical review [Neurosurg Rev] 2024 Apr 17; Vol. 47 (1), pp. 166. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 17.
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02405-0
Abstrakt: Introduction: Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CENETs), previously described as cauda equina paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare and well-vascularized benign entities which can be often misdiagnosed with other intradural tumors more common in this anatomical site, such as ependymomas and neurinomas. We describe three cases of CENETs observed at our institution with particular focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management. Since the lack of guidelines, we performed a literature review to identify factors that can predict recurrence and influence postoperative decision making.
Case Report and Literature Review: We report on three patients, two of them presenting with a clinical history of lower back pain and sciatica. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine with and without Gd-DTPA revealed an intradural lesion with strong contrast enhancement, first described as atypical ependymoma or schwannoma. A complete tumor resection was achieved in all cases, the histopathological diagnosis classified the tumors as CENETs. In our literature review, a total of 688 articles were screened and 162 patients were included. Patients demographic data, clinical symptoms, resection and recurrence were recorded.
Discussion: Differential diagnosis between CENETs and other more common tumors affecting cauda equina region, such as ependymomas or schwannomas (neurinomas), is still very challenging. Due to the lack of specific clinical or radiological characteristics, a correct preoperative diagnosis is almost impossible. With this paper we want to point out that CENETs must be considered in the differential diagnosis, most of all in case of entities with atypical radiological features. According to the literature, tumor recurrence after gross total resection is unlikely, while a long-term follow-up is recommended in case of subtotal resection or local aggressive behavior.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: