Proposal for a tiered regulatory framework for the aquatic risk assessment of pesticides in Brazil.

Autor: Santos GS; Syngenta Proteção de Cultivos Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil., Casallanovo F; Syngenta Proteção de Cultivos Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil., Scorza Júnior RP; Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Dourados, Brazil., Daam MA; School of Science and Technology, Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research (CENSE) & Global Change and Sustainability Institute (CHANGE), NOVA University Lisbon, NOVA, Caparica, Portugal.; Federal University of Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, MG, Brazil., Cione AP; Syngenta Proteção de Cultivos Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Integrated environmental assessment and management [Integr Environ Assess Manag] 2024 Sep; Vol. 20 (5), pp. 1514-1528. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 17.
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4931
Abstrakt: Aquatic risk assessment is essential to guarantee the sustainable use of pesticides and the conservation of water resources near agricultural fields. This article discusses a proposal for a tiered regulatory framework for the aquatic risk assessment of pesticides in Brazil. The first step is problem formulation, which includes establishing general and specific protection goals. In the exposure assessment, the Estimated Environmental Concentrations in water should be calculated based on realistic worst-case assumptions regarding application rate and frequency, the entry into the edge-of-field water body, and fate in the water body, using scenario-dependent models suggested by the Brazilian Environmental Agency. These calculations can be refined by including Efate studies with variable exposures to reflect realistic environmental conditions accurately and include mitigation measures that impact the modeling. In the hazard assessment, ecotoxicological data for toxicity to fish, aquatic invertebrates, algae, and aquatic plants should be required for all pesticides based on standardized protocols and species. Tier 2 has several refinement options, including incorporating toxicity data from additional test species and effect modeling. In Tier 3, population- and community-level effects are evaluated using semi-field studies. Considering the case study in Brazil, Tier 1 demonstrated that, from the 12 pesticides that were assessed, seven (58%) failed based on the value of the Risk Quotient. In Tier 2, when exposure refinement options and mitigation measures such as buffer zones are considered, all seven pesticides, for which Tier 1 indicated risk, still failed the assessment. The risk for four of these seven pesticides could be refined by considering toxicity information from additional species. Refinement options and mitigation measures that could be applied to the agricultural scenario in Brazil were discussed. In conclusion, the proposed tiered risk assessment is a feasible way to evaluate whether a pesticide will pose an unacceptable risk to aquatic organisms. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1514-1528. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
(© 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: