Impact of grade on workup of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study : Grade impact on workup of rectal NETs.
Autor: | Watanabe A; Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St., 5th Floor, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada., Rai S; Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St., 5th Floor, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada., Yip L; Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St., 5th Floor, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada., Brown CJ; St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada., Loree JM; BC Cancer Agency, 600 W 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada., Stuart HC; Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St., 5th Floor, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. Heather.Stuart@vch.ca. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | World journal of surgical oncology [World J Surg Oncol] 2024 Apr 16; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 98. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 16. |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12957-024-03379-5 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) are often discovered on screening colonoscopy. Indications for staging and definitive resection are inconsistent in current guidelines. We evaluated the role of grade in guiding staging and procedural decision-making. Methods: Patients with biopsy confirmed RNETs between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, staging investigations (biochemical and imaging), and endoscopic/surgical treatment were recorded. Associations between grade, preoperative staging, interventions, and survival were determined using Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact, log-rank, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Amongst 139 patients with RNETs, 9% were aged ≥ 75 years and 44% female. Tumor grade was: 73% grade 1 (G1), 18%, grade 2 (G2) and 9% grade 3 (G3). Staging investigations were performed in 52% of patients. All serum chromogranin A and 97% of 24-hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid tests were normal. The large majority of staging computed tomography (CT) scans were negative (76%) with subgroup analysis showing no G1 patients with CT identified distant disease compared with 38% of G2 and 50% of G3 patients (p < 0.001). G1 patients were more likely to achieve R0/R1 resections compared to G2 (95% vs. 50%, p < 0.001) and G1 patients had significantly better 5-year overall survival (G1: 98%, G2: 67%, G3: 10%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Tumor grade is important in preoperative workup and surgical decision-making. Biochemical staging may be omitted but staging CT should be considered for patients with grade ≥ 2 lesions. Anatomic resections should be considered for patients with grade 2 disease. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |