A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials.

Autor: Hawksworth O; Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. o.hawksworth@sheffield.ac.uk., Chatters R; Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Julious S; Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Cook A; Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK., Biggs K; Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Solaiman K; Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Quah MCH; School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Cheong SC; School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Trials [Trials] 2024 Apr 16; Vol. 25 (1), pp. 263. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 16.
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08100-1
Abstrakt: Background: n-of-1 trials are a type of crossover trial designed to optimise the evaluation of health technologies in individual patients. This trial design may be considered for the evaluation of health technologies in rare conditions where fewer patients are available to take part in research. This review describes the characteristics of randomised n-of-1 trials conducted over the span of 12 years, including how the n-of-1 design has been employed to study both rare and non-rare conditions.
Methods: Databases and clinical trials registries were searched for articles including "n-of-1" in the title between 2011 and 2023. The reference lists of reviews identified by the searches were searched for any additional eligible articles. Randomised n-of-1 trials were selected for inclusion and data were extracted on a range of design, population, and analysis characteristics. Descriptive statistics were produced for all variables.
Results: We identified 74 studies meeting our eligibility criteria, 13 of which (17.6%) were conducted in rare conditions. They were conducted in a range of clinical areas with the most common being neurological conditions (n = 16, 21.6%). The median (Q1, Q3) number of participants randomised was 9 (4, 20) and 12 trials (16.2%) involved a single patient only. Forty-six (62.2%) trials evaluated pharmaceutical interventions and 49 (66.2%) trials were placebo controlled. Trials had a median (Q1, Q3) of six (4, 8) periods and 61 (82.4%) compared two health technologies. Fifty-seven (77.0%) trials incorporated blinding and 32 (43.2%) had a washout period. Forty-nine trials (66.2%) used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess the primary outcome. Trials used a range of approaches to analysis and 48 (64.9%) combined data from multiple patients. The characteristics of the n-of-1 trials conducted in rare conditions were generally consistent with those in non-rare conditions.
Conclusions: n-of-1 trials are still underused and the application of the n-of-1 design for the evaluation of health technologies for rare diseases has been particularly limited. We have summarised the characteristics of randomised n-of-1 trials in rare and non-rare conditions. We hope that it can inform researchers in the design of future n-of-1 studies. Further work is required to provide guidance on specific design considerations, implementation, and statistical analysis of these studies.
Trial Registration: Not applicable.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje