Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies following autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation: a systematic review with pooled analysis.
Autor: | Erden M; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Uyanik E; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Demeestere I; HUB-Erasme Fertility Clinic, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium., Oktay KH; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Innovation Fertility Preservation and IVF, New York, NY. Electronic address: correspondence@fertilitypreservation.org. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2024 Nov; Vol. 231 (5), pp. 480-489. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 15. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.012 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: This study aimed to synthesize the existing evidence on perinatal outcomes after autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation, concurrently identifying key factors influencing these outcomes. Data Sources: A comprehensive search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies on the effect of autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation on perinatal outcomes from inception to October 22, 2023. Where there was missing information, the authors were contacted for updated data. Study Eligibility Criteria: Observational studies, such as cohort studies, case series, and case reports that reported a live birth after autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation, were considered eligible. Studies lacking data on women's demographic characteristics, autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation procedure details, or perinatal outcomes were excluded. In addition, cases involving fresh or nonautologous transplantations and those addressing primary ovarian insufficiency were excluded. Methods: Two reviewers (M.E. and E.U.) independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, and the results were then reviewed together. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023469296). Results: This review included 58 studies composed of 122 women with 162 deliveries (154 singletons and 8 twins) after autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation, resulting in 170 newborns. Of note, 83.6% of the women had a malignant disease. Moreover, most of these women (51.0%) were exposed to some form of chemotherapy before ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Of the 162 childbirths, 108 (66.7%) were conceived naturally, and 54 (33.3%) were conceived through assisted reproductive techniques. The birthweight of 88.5% of newborns was appropriate for gestational age, whereas 8.3% and 3.1% were small for gestational age and large for gestational age, respectively. The preterm birth rate was 9.4%, with the remaining being term deliveries. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were noted in 18.9% of women, including pregnancy-induced hypertension in 7.6%, preeclampsia in 9.4%, and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count in 1.9%. The incidences of gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm premature rupture of membranes were 3.8% for each condition. Neonatal anomalies were reported in 3 transplant recipients with 4 newborns: arthrogryposis, congenital cataract, and diaphragmatic hernia in a twin. Finally, among the recipients' characteristics, not receiving chemotherapy before ovarian tissue cryopreservation (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.72; P=.012) and natural conception (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.92; P=.035) were associated with a lower perinatal complication rate. Conclusion: On the basis of low certainty evidence from observational studies, perinatal complication rates did not increase after autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation compared with the general pregnant population, except for preeclampsia. This could be due to chemotherapy exposure, underlying medical conditions, and the common use of assisted reproductive techniques. Further larger studies are needed to explore the causes of increased preeclampsia incidence in autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation pregnancies. (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |