Comparison of Effectiveness of High Dose Statin Monotherapy With Combination of Statin and Ezetimibe to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
| Autor: | Damarpally N; Medicine, Houston Community College, Houston, USA., Sinha T; Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, NPL., Maricela Nunez M; Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, MEX., Guntha M; Internal Medicine, Sinai-Grace Hospital, Detroit, USA., Soe TM; Medicine, University of Medicine (1) Yangon, Yangon, MMR., Chaudhari SS; Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.; Family Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, USA., Ibrahim RA; Internal Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, SDN., Hirani S; Cardiology, Baqai Hospital, Karachi, PAK. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Mar 10; Vol. 16 (3), pp. e55922. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 10 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.55922 |
| Abstrakt: | This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of high statin monotherapy and a combination of statin and ezetimibe to prevent cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted comprehensive searches across online databases, including MEDLINE/ PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science, to find the relevant articles from the databases' inception to 10 Feb 2024. Outcomes assessed in the meta-analysis included major cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization. Data analysis was conducted utilizing RevMan Version 5.3.1. The comparison of outcomes between the two groups involved the calculation of risk ratios (RR) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CI) using either a random or fixed-effect model. Five studies were included in this meta-analysis, encompassing 48,668 patients. The pooled analysis showed that the risk of all-cause mortality was higher in patients receiving high statin monotherapy. However, no significant differences in MACE, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization were reported. While acknowledging the limitations, including the lack of randomized controlled trials and the dominance of one study in the analysis, these findings underscore the importance of further research to clarify the comparative effectiveness of these treatment modalities in preventing cardiovascular outcomes in ACS patients. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2024, Damarpally et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|